Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33909976›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2021

Improved Discrimination of Disease States Using Proteomics Data with the Updated Aristotle Classifier.

David Hua, Heather Desaire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David HuaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, United States.
Heather DesaireDepartment of Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2181-0112

Funding

Mass Spectrometry Measurements for Complex PTMsR35GM130354 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI DESAIRE, HEATHER R · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM130354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass spectrometry data sets from omics studies are an optimal information source for discriminating patients with disease and identifying biomarkers. Thousands of proteins or endogenous metabolites can be queried in each analysis, spanning several orders of magnitude in abundance. Machine learning tools that effectively leverage these data to accurately identify disease states are in high demand. While mass spectrometry data sets are rich with potentially useful information, using the data effectively can be challenging because of missing entries in the data sets and because the number of samples is typically much smaller than the number of features, two challenges that make machine learning difficult. To address this problem, we have modified a new supervised classification tool, the Aristotle Classifier, so that omics data sets can be better leveraged for identifying disease states. The optimized classifier, AC.2021, is benchmarked on multiple data sets against its predecessor and two leading supervised classification tools, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and XGBoost. The new classifier, AC.2021, outperformed existing tools on multiple tests using proteomics data. The underlying code for the classifier, provided herein, would be useful for researchers who desire improved classification accuracy when using their omics data sets to identify disease states.

Indexed as

ProteomicsSupport Vector MachineAlgorithmsBiomarkersHumansMachine LearningBiomarkersAlzheimer’s diseaseAristotle Classifiermachine learningmass spectrometryproteomicsROCSVMXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID33909976
PMCPMC8541691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.