Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33909646›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in a cohort of New York City metro blood donors using multiple SARS-CoV-2 serological assays: Implications for controlling the epidemic and "Reopening".

Daniel K Jin, Daniel J Nesbitt, Jenny Yang, Haidee Chen, Julie Horowitz, Marcus Jones, Rianna Vandergaast, Timothy Carey, Samantha Reiter, Stephen J Russell and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Trends in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Seroprevalence in Massachusetts Estimated from Newborn Screening Specimens.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel K JinLaboratory of Stem Cell Regenerative Research, Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, New York, NY, United States of America.
Daniel J NesbittLaboratory of Stem Cell Regenerative Research, Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, New York, NY, United States of America.
Jenny YangLaboratory of Stem Cell Regenerative Research, Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, New York, NY, United States of America.
Haidee ChenLaboratory of Stem Cell Regenerative Research, Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, New York, NY, United States of America.
Julie HorowitzRegeneron Genetics Center, Tarrytown, NY, United States of America.
Marcus JonesRegeneron Genetics Center, Tarrytown, NY, United States of America.
Rianna VandergaastImanis Life Sciences, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Timothy CareyImanis Life Sciences, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Samantha ReiterImanis Life Sciences, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Stephen J RussellVyriad, Inc., Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Christos KyratsousRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, United States of America.
Andrea HooperRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, United States of America.
Jennifer HamiltonRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, United States of America.
Manuel FerreiraRegeneron Genetics Center, Tarrytown, NY, United States of America.
Sarah DengRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, United States of America.
Donna StrausNew York Blood Center Enterprises, New York, NY, United States of America.
Aris BarasRegeneron Genetics Center, Tarrytown, NY, United States of America.
Christopher D HillyerLaboratory of Stem Cell Regenerative Research, Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, New York, NY, United States of America.
Larry L LuchsingerLaboratory of Stem Cell Regenerative Research, Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, New York, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0063-1764
Regeneron (United States) · USNew York Blood Center · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Hormetic ER Stress Regulation of Hematopoietic Stem Cell FunctionR01HL155574 · NHLBI · NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER · PI LUCHSINGER, LARRY L · 2021 to 2025
$2.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL155574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Projections of the stage of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic and local, regional and national public health policies to limit coronavirus spread as well as "reopen" cities and states, are best informed by serum neutralizing antibody titers measured by reproducible, high throughput, and statically credible antibody (Ab) assays. To date, a myriad of Ab tests, both available and FDA authorized for emergency, has led to confusion rather than insight per se. The present study reports the results of a rapid, point-in-time 1,000-person cohort study using serial blood donors in the New York City metropolitan area (NYC) using multiple serological tests, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and high throughput serological assays (HTSAs). These were then tested and associated with assays for neutralizing Ab (NAb). Of the 1,000 NYC blood donor samples in late June and early July 2020, 12.1% and 10.9% were seropositive using the Ortho Total Ig and the Abbott IgG HTSA assays, respectively. These serological assays correlated with neutralization activity specific to SARS-CoV-2. The data reported herein suggest that seroconversion in this population occurred in approximately 1 in 8 blood donors from the beginning of the pandemic in NYC (considered March 1, 2020). These findings deviate with an earlier seroprevalence study in NYC showing 13.7% positivity. Collectively however, these data demonstrate that a low number of individuals have serologic evidence of infection during this "first wave" and suggest that the notion of "herd immunity" at rates of ~60% or higher are not near. Furthermore, the data presented herein show that the nature of the Ab-based immunity is not invariably associated with the development of NAb. While the blood donor population may not mimic precisely the NYC population as a whole, rapid assessment of seroprevalence in this cohort and serial reassessment could aid public health decision making.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBlood DonorsCohort StudiesCOVID-19Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GMaleMiddle AgedNew York CityAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

Identifiers

PMID33909646
PMCPMC8081167
OpenAlexW3157598477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.