Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33909621›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Domestic dog demographics and estimates of canine vaccination coverage in a rural area of Zambia for the elimination of rabies.

Chiho Kaneko, Ryosuke Omori, Michihito Sasaki, Chikako Kataoka-Nakamura, Edgar Simulundu, Walter Muleya, Ladslav Moonga, Joseph Ndebe, Bernard M Hang'ombe, George Dautu and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Chiho KanekoUnit of Risk Analysis and Management, Hokkaido University Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Ryosuke OmoriDivision of Bioinformatics, Hokkaido University Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9635-1459
Michihito SasakiDivision of Molecular Pathobiology, Hokkaido University Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1607-2175
Chikako Kataoka-NakamuraUnit of Risk Analysis and Management, Hokkaido University Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Edgar SimulunduDepartment of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0001-9423-0816
Walter MuleyaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0001-8874-3965
Ladslav MoongaDepartment of Para-Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Joseph NdebeDepartment of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Bernard M Hang'ombeDepartment of Para-Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
George DautuVirology Unit, Central Veterinary Research Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.
Yongjin QiuHokudai Center for Zoonosis Control in Zambia, Hokkaido University Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8621-5472
Ryo NakaoLaboratory of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Graduate School of Infectious Diseases, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3105-7603
Masahiro KajiharaDivision of Global Epidemiology, Hokkaido University Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Akina Mori-KajiharaDivision of Global Epidemiology, Hokkaido University Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Herman M ChambaroDivision of Molecular Pathobiology, Hokkaido University Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1407-6818
Hideaki HigashiHokudai Center for Zoonosis Control in Zambia, Hokkaido University Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Chihiro SugimotoDivision of Collaboration and Education, Hokkaido University Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8708-0140
Hirofumi SawaDivision of Molecular Pathobiology, Hokkaido University Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2569-2755
Aaron S MweeneDepartment of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Ayato TakadaDepartment of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Norikazu IsodaUnit of Risk Analysis and Management, Hokkaido University Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3480-988X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn estimated 75% or more of the human rabies cases in Africa occur in rural settings, which underscores the importance of rabies control in these areas. Understanding dog demographics can help design strategies for rabies control and plan and conduct canine mass vaccination campaigns effectively in African countries. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsA cross-sectional survey was conducted to investigate domestic dog demographics in Kalambabakali, in the rural Mazabuka District of Zambia. The population of ownerless dogs and the total achievable vaccination coverage among the total dog population was estimated using the capture-recapture-based Bayesian model by conducting a canine mass vaccination campaign. This study revealed that 29% of the domestic dog population was under one year old, and 57.7% of those were under three months old and thus were not eligible for the canine rabies vaccination in Zambia. The population growth was estimated at 15% per annum based on the cross-sectional household survey. The population of ownerless dogs was estimated to be small, with an ownerless-to-owned-dog ratio of 0.01-0.06 in the target zones. The achieved overall vaccination coverage from the first mass vaccination was estimated 19.8-51.6%. This low coverage was principally attributed to the owners' lack of information, unavailability, and dog-handling difficulties. The follow-up mass vaccination campaign achieved an overall coverage of 54.8-76.2%. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This paper indicates the potential for controlling canine rabies through mass vaccination in rural Zambia. Rabies education and responsible dog ownership are required to achieve high and sustainable vaccination coverage. Our findings also propose including puppies below three months old in the target population for rabies vaccination and emphasize that securing an annual enforcement of canine mass vaccination that reaches 70% coverage in the dog population is necessary to maintain protective herd immunity.

Indexed as

AnimalsBayes TheoremCross-Sectional StudiesDog DiseasesDogsFemaleMaleMass VaccinationOwnershipRabiesRabies VaccinesRural PopulationVaccination CoverageZambiaRabies Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID33909621
PMCPMC8081203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.