Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33909208›Full record

ReviewCancer causes & control : CCC2021

Symposium report: breast cancer in India-trends, environmental exposures and clinical implications.

Jasmine A McDonald, Roshni Rao, Marley Gibbons, Rajiv Janardhanan, Surinder Jaswal, Ravi Mehrotra, Manoj Pandey, Venkatraman Radhakrishnan, Pooja Ramakant, Nandini Verma and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Jasmine A McDonaldDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 722 West 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA. jam2319@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8270-8074
Roshni RaoHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Marley GibbonsDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 722 West 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Rajiv JanardhananLaboratory of Disease Dynamics & Molecular Epidemiology, Amity Institute of Public Health, Amity University, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Surinder JaswalSchool of Research Methodology, Centre for Health and Mental Health, School of Social Work, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Ravi MehrotraIndian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) - India Cancer Research Consortium, New Delhi, India.
Manoj PandeyInstitute of Medical Sciences, Department of Surgical Oncology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Venkatraman RadhakrishnanCancer Institute (W.I.A), Chennai, India.
Pooja RamakantKing Georges Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Nandini VermaTNBC Precision Medicine Research Laboratory, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research, and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Center, Khargar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Mary Beth TerryDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 722 West 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USCancer Institute (WIA) · INHomi Bhabha National Institute · INIndian Council of Medical Research · INInstitute of Medical Sciences · INInstitute of Public Health Bengaluru · INKing George's Medical University · INTata Institute of Social Sciences · IN

Funding

Yusuf K. Hamied Mary Beth Terry, PH.D and
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIncidence of breast cancer (BC), particularly in young women, are rising in India. Without population-based mammography screening, rising rates cannot be attributed to screening. Investigations are needed to understand the potential drivers of this trend.

methodsAn international team of experts convened to discuss the trends, environmental exposures, and clinical implications associated with BC in India and outlined recommendations for its management.

resultsPanels were structured across three major BC themes (n = 10 presentations). The symposium concluded with a semi-structured Think Tank designed to elicit short-term and long-term goals that could address the challenges of BC in India.

conclusionThere was consensus that the prevalence of late-stage BC and the high BC mortality rates are associated with the practice of detection, which is primarily through clinical and self-breast exams, as opposed to mammography. Triple-Negative BC (TNBC) was extensively discussed, including TNBC etiology and potential risk factors, the limited treatment options, and if reported TNBC rates are supported by rigorous scientific evidence. The Think Tank session yielded long-term and short-term goals to further BC reduction in India and included more regional etiological studies on environmental exposures using existing India-based cohorts and case-control studies, standardization for molecular subtyping of BC cases, and improving the public's awareness of breast health.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerEnvironmental ExposureHumansIndiaMammographyReference StandardsRisk FactorsBreast cancerIncidence trendsIndiaRisk factorsTriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID33909208
PMCPMC8089075
OpenAlexW3158585047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.