Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33909188›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2021

Synbiotic formulation of Cichorium intybus root powder with Lactobacillus acidophilus NCDC15 and Lactobacillus reuteri BFE7 improves growth performance in Murrah buffalo calves via altering selective gut health indices.

Manpreet Singh, Sachin Kumar, P S Banakar, V V Vinay, Asit Das, Nitin Tyagi, A K Tyagi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Effects of inactivatedAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026
    Article
  5. Impact of Probiotics and Prebiotics on Gut Microbiome and Hormonal Regulation.Gastrointestinal disorders (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Current research in food science · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manpreet Singh *Animal Nutrition Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.
Sachin Kumar *Animal Nutrition Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India. arensachin@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1233-9450
P S BanakarAnimal Nutrition Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.
V V VinayAnimal Nutrition Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.
Asit DasAnimal Nutrition Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.
Nitin TyagiAnimal Nutrition Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.
A K TyagiAnimal Nutrition Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.

Funding

NCVTC F.No: NCVTC/Budget/2019-20/860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of synbiotic formulation of Cichorium intybus root powder (C) with Lactobacillus acidophilus NCDC15 (LA) and Lactobacillus reuteri BFE7 (LR) on growth performance in Murrah buffalo calves via monitoring selective gut health indices. Twenty-four Murrah buffalo calves of 5-7 days old and 33 ± 2.0 kg of body weight were distributed randomly into three groups adopting complete randomized design (CRD) as follows: (1) group I served as control (CON) provided with a basal diet alone; (2) group II supplemented with synbiotic formulation of 200 mL L. acidophilus NCDC15 fermented milk with 8 g of Cichorium intybus root powder (LAC) along with basal diet; (3) group III supplemented with synbiotic formulation of 200 mL L. reuteri BFE7 fermented milk with 8 g of Cichorium intybus root powder (LRC) along with basal diet. The final body weight (BW), average dry matter intake (DMI) and structural body measurements were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in LAC and LRC groups by synbiotic as compared to the CON. No effect was registered on apparent nutrient digestibility coefficient of various nutrients in supplemented groups. Faecal score was reduced by the supplementation of synbiotic being lowest in LRC followed by LAC and CON. Calves supplemented synbiotic showed lower (P < 0.05) faecal pH and ammonia with a concomitant increase in faecal lactate levels and faecal short chain fatty acids (SCFA) as compared to control. The faecal Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium population was increased (P < 0.05) in synbiotic fed groups as compared to control. Additionally, coliform and clostridia count was decreased (P < 0.05) in treatment groups compared to CON. Overall, it may be concluded that synbiotic supplementation was effective in improving the growth performance in Murrah buffalo calves via altering selective gut health indices.

Indexed as

Cichorium intybusLimosilactobacillus reuteriSynbioticsAnimal FeedAnimalsBuffaloesDietLactobacillus acidophilusPowdersPowdersFaecal metabolitesGrowthGut healthMurrah buffalo calvesSynbiotic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.