Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33909171›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2021

Nationwide evaluation of mutation-tailored treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in daily clinical practice.

Elisabeth M P Steeghs, Hans Gelderblom, Vincent K Y Ho, Quirinus J M Voorham, Stefan M Willems, PATH consortium, Katrien Grünberg, Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabeth M P SteeghsDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hans GelderblomDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Vincent K Y HoDepartments of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Quirinus J M VoorhamPALGA Foundation, Houten, The Netherlands.
Stefan M WillemsPALGA Foundation, Houten, The Netherlands.
PATH consortium
Katrien GrünbergDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marjolijn J L LigtenbergDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Marjolijn.Ligtenberg@radboudumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-1290-1474
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMolecular analysis of KIT and PDGFRA is critical for tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment selection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and hence recommended by international guidelines. We performed a nationwide study into the application of predictive mutation testing in GIST patients and its impact on targeted treatment decisions in clinical practice.

methodsReal-world clinical and pathology information was obtained from GIST patients with initial diagnosis in 2017-2018 through database linkage between the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the nationwide Dutch Pathology Registry.

resultsPredictive mutation analysis was performed in 89% of the patients with high risk or metastatic disease. Molecular testing rates were higher for patients treated in expertise centers (96%) compared to non-expertise centers (75%, P < 0.01). Imatinib therapy was applied in 81% of the patients with high risk or metastatic disease without patient's refusal or adverse characteristics, e.g., comorbidities or resistance mutations. Mutation analysis that was performed in 97% of these imatinib-treated cases, did not guarantee mutation-tailored treatment: 2% of these patients had the PDGFRA p.D842V resistance mutation and 7% initiated imatinib therapy at the normal instead of high dose despite of having a KIT exon 9 mutation.

conclusionIn conclusion, nationwide real-world data show that over 81% of the eligible high risk or metastatic disease patients receive targeted therapy, which was tailored to the mutation status as recommended in guidelines in 88% of cases. Therefore, still 27% of these GIST patients misses out on mutation-tailored treatment. The reasons for suboptimal uptake of testing and treatment require further study.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsStomach NeoplasmsHumansMutationProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alphaAntineoplastic AgentsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alphaGastrointestinal stromal tumorGuidelinesImatinibKITMolecular targeted therapyPDGFRAPredictive genetic testing

Identifiers

PMID33909171
PMCPMC8338807
OpenAlexW3159295557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.