Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33909167›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2021

Novel 2D allotropic forms and nanoflakes of silicon, phosphorus, and germanium: a computational study.

Cesar Gabriel Vera de la Garza, Wilmer Esteban Vallejo Narváez, Luis Daniel Solís Rodríguez, Serguei Fomine

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07418671 (Ultrasound Guided Lumbar Erector Spinae Block Using Bupivacaine - Magnesium Sulphate Versus Bupivacaine - Dexamethasone in Total Hip Replacement Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07418671 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Ultrasound Guided Lumbar Erector Spinae Block Using Bupivacaine - Magnesium Sulphate Versus Bupivacaine - Dexamethasone in Total Hip Replacement Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled66ConditionsPost-operative Pain, Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA), Erector Spinae Plane BlockArmsBupivacaine-Magnesium Sulphate, Bupivacaine-Dexamethasone, Bupivacaine-Saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cesar Gabriel Vera de la GarzaInstituto de Investigaciones en Materiales, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-360, CU, Coyoacán, 04510, Mexico, DF, Mexico.
Wilmer Esteban Vallejo NarváezInstituto de Investigaciones en Materiales, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-360, CU, Coyoacán, 04510, Mexico, DF, Mexico.
Luis Daniel Solís RodríguezInstituto de Investigaciones en Materiales, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-360, CU, Coyoacán, 04510, Mexico, DF, Mexico.
Serguei FomineInstituto de Investigaciones en Materiales, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-360, CU, Coyoacán, 04510, Mexico, DF, Mexico. fomine@unam.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7068-7579

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología 251684Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México CJIC/CTIC/4732/2O2O.PAPIIT IN201219/31
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structural variability offered by 2D materials is an essential feature in materials design. Despite its significance, obtaining assemblies with suitable stability remains a challenge. In this work, we theoretically explore novel silicon, phosphorus, and germanium, analogues of haeckelites at hybrid DFT level. Both 2D systems and nanoflakes (NF) have been studied. All materials have been found dynamically stable; Si-, P-, and Ge- analogues of haeckelites were found to be more stable in comparison to the corresponding honeycomb structure than haeckelites in comparison with graphene. All 2D materials showed metallic behavior; however, the difference between inorganic haeckelites and the corresponding honeycomb allotropes is less than that between haeckelites and graphene. Si-, P-, and Ge-, allotropes have much higher electron affinities (EAs) compared to carbon allotropes, while haeckelites have higher EAs than honeycomb structures. Furthermore, Si-, P-, and Ge-structures also exhibit low hopping activation energies for lithium atoms. It makes these materials potentially promising as a component in Li-ion batteries.

Indexed as

DFTInorganic analogues of haeckelitesLithiumNanoflakes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.