Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33909157›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2021

What is the best approach to adopt for identifying the domains for a new measure of health, social care and carer-related quality of life to measure quality-adjusted life years? Application to the development of the EQ-HWB?

Tessa Peasgood, Clara Mukuria, Jill Carlton, Janice Connell, Nancy Devlin, Karen Jones, Rosemary Lovett, Bhash Naidoo, Stacey Rand, Juan Carlos Rejon-Parrilla and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Psychometric evaluation of the Disability Wellbeing Index (DWI) against the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) among people with disability.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  3. Exploration of visual analogue scale versions with the EQ-HWB-9 to measure health, social care, and carer-related quality of life: a VASt landscape.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  4. Psychometric performance of the experimental EQ-HWB-9 and EQ-5D-5L in the general Chinese population.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  5. Measuring outcomes for loneliness research: examining the appropriateness of the EQ-5D-5 L and EQ-HWB.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  6. Valuing health and wellbeing using discrete choice experiment: exploring feasibility, design effect and international preference similarity.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  7. Developing a quality of life framework from the perspective of laypeople: a qualitative comparison with the EQ-HWB framework.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  8. The psychometric performance of the EQ-HWB-9 for measuring health and wellbeing in a general population sample from Australia and New Zealand.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploring subjective constructions of quality of life in patients, carers and the healthy general public: a Q-methodological study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Associations between financial toxicity, health-related quality of life, and well-being in Indonesian patients with breast cancer.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  14. The performance of the EQ-HWB-S as a measure of quality-of-life of caregivers in families that have experienced adverse events.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Scoring the EQ-HWB-S: can we do it without value sets? A non-parametric item response theory analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Extending the EQ-5D: the case for a complementary set of 4 psycho-social dimensions.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  20. How important is subjective well-being for patients? A qualitative interview study of people with psoriasis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Tessa PeasgoodSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. Tessa.Peasgood@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8024-7801
Clara MukuriaSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Jill CarltonSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Janice ConnellSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Nancy DevlinSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Karen JonesPersonal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Rosemary LovettNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), London, UK.
Bhash NaidooNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), London, UK.
Stacey RandPersonal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Juan Carlos Rejon-ParrillaNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), London, UK.
Donna RowenSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Aki TsuchiyaSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
John BrazierSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
University of Sheffield · GBNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence · GBThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Kent · GB

Funding

EuroQol Research Foundation EQ Project 2016710EuroQol Research Foundation EQ Project 20180350Medical Research Council MR/P015549/1MRF_ MR/P015549/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Economic evaluation combines costs and benefits to support decision-making when assessing new interventions using preference-based measures to measure and value benefits in health or health-related quality of life. These health-focused instruments have limited ability to capture wider impacts on informal carers or outcomes in other sectors such as social care. Sector-specific instruments can be used but this is problematic when the impact of an intervention straddles different sectors.An alternative approach is to develop a generic preference-based measure that is sufficiently broad to capture important cross-sector outcomes. We consider the options for the selection of domains for a cross-sector generic measure including how to identify domains, who should provide information on the domains and how this should be framed. Beyond domain identification, considerations of criteria and stakeholder needs are also identified.This paper sets out the case for an approach that relies on the voice of patients, social care users and informal carers as the main source of domains and describes how the approach was operationalised in the 'Extending the QALY' project which developed the new measure, the EQ-HWB (EQ health and wellbeing instrument). We conclude by discussing the strengths and limitations of this approach. The new measure should be sufficiently generic to be used to consistently evaluate health and social care interventions, yet also sensitive enough to pick up important changes in quality of life in patients, social care users and carers.

Indexed as

CaregiversQuality of LifeCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansQuality-Adjusted Life YearsSocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesCarersDomain selectionExtending the QALY projectMeasuring and valuing healthPROMQALYSocial care

Identifiers

PMID33909157
PMCPMC8318935
OpenAlexW3157441306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.