ArticleThe European physical journal. E, Soft matter2021
Analysis of purification of charged giant vesicles in a buffer using their size distribution.
Article in The European physical journal. E, Soft matter, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of sugar concentration on the electroporation, size distribution and average size of charged giant unilamellar vesicles.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2022Article
- Effects of cholesterol on the size distribution and bending modulus of lipid vesicles.PloS one · 2022Article
- Recent developments in the kinetics of ruptures of giant vesicles under constant tension.RSC advances · 2021Review
- A new purification technique to obtain specific size distribution of giant lipid vesicles using dual filtration.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We have analyzed the purification of charged giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) prepared in a buffer containing various concentrations of salt using their size distribution. The membranes of GUVs were synthesized by a mixture of dioleoylphosphocholine (DOPC) and dioleoylphosphatidylglycerol (DOPG) lipids. The DOPG mole fractions (X) in the membranes of GUVs were 0.10, 0.25, 0.40, 0.55, 0.70, 0.90 in a physiological buffer containing 162 mM salt. In addition, for a fixed value of X the concentrations of salt (C) in the buffer were 12, 62, 112, 162, 212, 312, 362 mM. The size distribution histograms of experimentally investigated unpurified and purified GUVs were fitted with the lognormal distribution and obtained the multiplication factor [Formula: see text] for mean ([Formula: see text]) and [Formula: see text] for standard deviation ([Formula: see text]) of the lognormal distribution. The key parameters [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] were responsible for changing the average size and size distribution of unpurified GUVs to purified ones. The theoretically fitting equation of experimentally obtained X- and C-dependent values of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] provided the calibration equation for estimating the average size of purified GUVs theoretically for any values of X and C. The estimated size of purified GUVs increased with the increase in electrostatic effect (i.e., increase in vesicle surface charge density or decrease in salt concentration in buffer). The estimated size of purified GUVs varied with X and C, which supported the previous report qualitatively. These investigations might be helpful in the field of cell/chemical biology for understanding the process of purification of vesicles/cells investigated by any other techniques.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.