Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33909112›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2021

The role of somatosensation in automatic visuo-motor control: a comparison of congenital and acquired sensory loss.

R Chris Miall, Daria Afanasyeva, Jonathan D Cole, Peggy Mason

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Unwrapping the mirror tracing task.Behavior research methods · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

R Chris MiallSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. r.c.miall@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3002-1251
Daria AfanasyevaSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Jonathan D ColeCentre of Postgraduate Research and Education, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
Peggy MasonDepartment of Neurobiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Birmingham · GBBournemouth University · GBUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Effect of congenital vs acquired somatosensory deafferentation on self-body schemaR03NS113752 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MASON, PEGGY, MIALL, CHRIS · 2019 to 2020
$154k
NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS113752NINDS NIH HHS R03NS113752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of chronically deafferented participants have illuminated how regaining some motor control after adult-onset loss of proprioceptive and touch input depends heavily on cognitive control. In this study we contrasted the performance of one such man, IW, with KS, a woman born without any somatosensory fibres. We postulated that her life-long absence of proprioception and touch might have allowed her to automate some simple visually-guided actions, something IW appears unable to achieve. We tested these two, and two age-matched control groups, on writing and drawing tasks performed with and without an audio-verbal echoing task that added a cognitive demand. In common with other studies of skilled action, the dual task was shown to affect visuo-motor performance in controls, with less well-controlled drawing and writing, evident as increases in path speed and reduction in curvature and trial duration. We found little evidence that IW was able to automate even the simplest drawing tasks and no evidence for automaticity in his writing. In contrast, KS showed a selective increase in speed of signature writing under the dual-task conditions, suggesting some ability to automate her most familiar writing. We also tested tracing of templates under mirror-reversed conditions, a task that imposes a powerful cognitive planning challenge. Both IW and KS showed evidence of a visuo-motor planning conflict, as did the controls, for shapes with sharp corners. Overall, IW was much faster than his controls to complete tracing shapes, consistent with an absence of visuo-proprioceptive conflict, whereas KS was slower than her controls, especially as the corners became sharper. She dramatically improved after a short period of practice while IW did not. We conclude that KS, who developed from birth without proprioception, may have some visually derived control of movement not under cognitive control, something not seen in IW. This allowed her to automate some writing and drawing actions, but impaired her initial attempts at mirror-tracing. In contrast, IW, who lost somatosensation as an adult, cannot automate these visually guided actions.

Indexed as

ProprioceptionPsychomotor PerformanceAdultFemaleHumansMaleTouchAutomaticityDrawingHuman movementMirror-tracingProprioceptionSomatosensationWriting

Identifiers

PMID33909112
PMCPMC8282580
OpenAlexW3158233290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.