Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33909105›Full record

ArticleDer Anaesthesist2021

[The position of the head during treatment in the emergency room-an explorative analysis of immobilization of the cervical spine].

Matthias K Jung, Davut D Uzun, Gregor V R von Ehrlich-Treuenstätt, Paul A Grützner, Michael Kreinest

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Analysis of spine motion during prehospital extrication procedures in motorsport.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthias K JungZentrum für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie, Klinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Deutschland.
Davut D UzunZentrum für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie, Klinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Deutschland.
Gregor V R von Ehrlich-TreuenstättZentrum für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie, Klinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Deutschland.
Paul A GrütznerZentrum für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie, Klinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Deutschland.
Michael KreinestZentrum für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie, Klinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Deutschland. Michael.kreinest@bgu-ludwigshafen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmobilization of the cervical spine is a standard procedure in emergency medicine mostly achieved via a cervical collar. In the emergency room other forms of immobilization are utilized as cervical collars have certain drawbacks. The present study aimed to provide preliminary data on the efficiency of immobilization in the emergency room by analyzing the residual spinal motion of the patient's head on different kinds of head rests.

methodsIn the present study biomechanical motion data of the cervical spine of a test subject were analyzed. The test subject was placed in a supine position on a mobile stretcher (Stryker M1 Roll-In System, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) wearing a cervical collar (Perfit ACE, Ballerup, Denmark). Three different head rests were tested: standard pillow, concave pillow and cavity pillow. The test subject carried out a predetermined motion protocol: right side inclination, left side inclination, flexion and extension. The residual spinal motion was recorded with wireless motion trackers (inertial measurement unit, Xsens Technologies, Enschede, The Netherlands). The first measurement was performed without a cervical collar or positioning on the pillows to measure the physiological baseline motion. Subsequently, three measurements were taken with the cervical collar applied and the pillows in place. From these measurements, a motion score was calculated that can represent the motion of the cervical spine.

resultsWhen the test subject's head was positioned on a standard pillow the physiological motion score was reduced from 69 to 40. When the test subject's head was placed on concave pillow the motion score was further reduced from 69 to 35. When the test subject's head was placed on cavity pillow the motion score was reduced from 69 to 59. The observed differences in the overall motion score of the cervical spine are mainly due to reduced flexion and extension rather than rotation or lateral inclination.

conclusionThe motion score of the cervical spine using motion sensors can provide important information for future analyses. The results of the present study suggest that trauma patients can be immobilized in the early trauma phase with a cervical collar and a head rest. The application of a cervical collar and the positioning on the concave pillow may achieve a good immobilization of the cervical spine in trauma patients in the early trauma phase.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeImmobilizationEmergency Service, HospitalHumansRange of Motion, ArticularRotationCervical collarCervical spineEmergency departmentHead restTrauma treatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.