Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33909100›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2021

Trimodal therapy with high-dose-rate brachytherapy and hypofractionated external beam radiation combined with long-term androgen deprivation for unfavorable-risk prostate cancer.

Keiichiro Mori, Hiroshi Sasaki, Yuki Tsutsumi, Shun Sato, Yuki Takiguchi, Shun Saito, Eriko Nishi, Gen Ishii, Toshihiro Yamamoto, Yusuke Koike and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Toxicity of dose-escalated radiotherapy up to 84 Gy for prostate cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 7 countries.

Keiichiro MoriDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, 105-8461, Tokyo, Japan. morikeiichiro29@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6147-6569
Hiroshi SasakiDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, 105-8461, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuki TsutsumiDepartment of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shun SatoDepartment of Pathology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuki TakiguchiDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, 105-8461, Tokyo, Japan.
Shun SaitoDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, 105-8461, Tokyo, Japan.
Eriko NishiDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, 105-8461, Tokyo, Japan.
Gen IshiiDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, 105-8461, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshihiro YamamotoDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, 105-8461, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke KoikeDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, 105-8461, Tokyo, Japan.
Jun MikiDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, 105-8461, Tokyo, Japan.
Tatsuya ShimomuraDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, 105-8461, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro KimuraDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, 105-8461, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenta MikiDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, 105-8461, Tokyo, Japan.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Hiroyuki TakahashiDepartment of Pathology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Manabu AokiDepartment of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shin EgawaDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, 105-8461, Tokyo, Japan.
Jikei University School of Medicine · JPUniversity of Jordan · JO

Funding

SHIP0804 NCT00664456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the outcomes of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy and hypofractionated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) combined with long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in very-high-risk (VHR) versus high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa), as defined in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria.

methodsData from 338 consecutive HR or VHR PCa patients who had undergone this tri-modal therapy between 2005 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free, progression-free, overall, and cancer-specific survival (BCRFS/PFS/OS/CSS) rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Wilcoxon test. Cox regression models were used to evaluate candidate prognostic factors for survival. C‑indexes were used to assess model discrimination.

resultsWithin a median follow-up of 84 months, 68 patients experienced BCR, 58 had disease progression including only 3 with local progression, 27 died of any cause, and 2 died from PCa. The 5‑year BCRFS, PFS, OS, and CSS rates were 82.2% (HR 86.5%; VHR 70.0%), 90.0% (HR 94.3%; VHR 77.6%), 95.7% (HR, 97.1%; VHR, 91.8%), and 99.6% (HR, 100%; VHR, 98.0%), respectively. In multivariable analyses that adjusted for standard clinicopathologic features, the risk subclassification was associated both PFS and OS (p = 0.0003 and 0.001, respectively). Adding the risk subclassification improved the accuracy of models in predicting BCRFS, PFS, and OS.

conclusionWhile the outcome of this trimodal approach appears favorable, VHR PCa patients had significantly worse oncological outcomes than those with HR PCa. The NCCN risk subclassification should be integrated into prognostic tools to guide risk stratification, treatment, and follow-up for unfavorable PCa patients receiving this trimodal therapy.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyProstatic NeoplasmsAndrogen AntagonistsAndrogensHumansMaleProstate-Specific AntigenRetrospective StudiesAndrogen AntagonistsAndrogensProstate-Specific AntigenHigh riskNational Comprehensive Cancer NetworkPrognostic modelRetrospectiveVery high risk

Identifiers

PMID33909100
PMCPMC8547210
OpenAlexW3157565634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.