ArticleThe Gerontologist2022
Measurement Indicators of Age-Friendly Communities: Findings From the AARP Age-Friendly Community Survey.
Article in The Gerontologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age-Friendly Environments for Healthy Ageing in Place: Refinement of a Multidimensional Index and Regional Disparities in South Korea.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Perceived Accessibility of Living Environment and Services Questionnaire: Validity and Reliability.OTJR : occupation, participation and health · 2026Article
- AFLE-HIV: developing an age-friendly living environment assessment framework for elderly HIV-infected individuals in China.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Association between Age-Friendly Environment, Sarcopenia and Frailty among Older Adults in China: A Longitudinal Study.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2026Article
- A qualitative assessment of older adults' perspective on the utilization of information from preventive home visits.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Article
- Developing an indicator for community-level age-friendly communities: the Japan gerontological evaluation study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- A Typology of Livable Communities and Older Adults' Health in the U.S.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Multidimensional Evaluation of the Process of Constructing Age-Friendly Communities Among Different Aged Community Residents in Beijing, China: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025Article
- Article
- Operationalizing age-friendliness in urban China: a multi-case study of gated retirement and open multi-generational communities.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Exploring the influence factors and operating mechanisms of age-friendly communities in urban fringe areas from the resilience perspective: a case study in Shangjie Township, Southeast China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The impact of age-friendly communities on the quality of life of older adults based on structural equation modeling.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Questionnaire (AFCCQ-Arabic).Frontiers in sociology · 2025Article
- The Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Questionnaire: A validation study of the Hebrew version in Israel.Heliyon · 2024Article
- "It Made Me Change the Way I Do Business": Outcomes From Age-Friendly Community Initiatives as Systems Change.The Gerontologist · 2024Article
- Assessing Age-Friendly Community Initiatives: Developing a Novel Survey Tool for Assessment and Evaluation.The Gerontologist · 2024Article
- Association of information technology ability, workplace social engagement, and successful ageing: validation of a short measure with three African samples.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Construction and improvement strategies of an age-friendly evaluation system for public spaces in affordable housing communities: a case study of Shenzhen.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesCities and counties worldwide have adopted the concept of "age-friendly communities." These communities aspire to promote older adults' well-being by providing a safe, affordable built environment and a social environment that encourages their participation. A major limitation in this field is the lack of valid and reliable measures that capture the complex dimensionality and dynamic nature of the aging-environment interface. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsThis study uses data from the AARP 2016 Age-Friendly Community Surveys (N = 3,652 adults aged 65 and older). The survey includes 62 indicators of age-friendliness, for example, outdoor spaces, transportation, housing, social participation, and community and health services. We randomly split the sample into 2 equal subsamples for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM).
resultsCFA results indicated that both the 5-factor model and the second-order factor model adequately fit the data. In the SEM 5-factor model, outdoor space (β = 0.134; p = .017), social participation (β = 0.307; p < .001), and community and health services (β = -0.149; p = .008) were associated with self-rated health, the outcome of interest. The path coefficients of housing and transportation were not significant. In the second-order factor model, people who lived in more age-friendly communities reported better self-rated health (β = 0.295; p < .001). DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Our findings show that the Age-Friendly Community Survey measures demonstrate reliability and concurrent validity. To promote older adults' well-being, practitioners, policymakers, and researchers should focus on improving their built and social environments. They can use these measures for short- and long-term planning, monitoring, and evaluating age-friendly community initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.