Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33909066›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2021

Unusual Localization of Blood-Borne Loa loa Microfilariae in the Skin Depends on Microfilarial Density in the Blood: Implications for Onchocerciasis Diagnosis in Coendemic Areas.

Yannick Niamsi-Emalio, Hugues C Nana-Djeunga, Cédric B Chesnais, Sébastien D S Pion, Jules B Tchatchueng-Mbougua, Michel Boussinesq, María-Gloria Basáñez, Joseph Kamgno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. What Can Modeling Tell Us About Sustainable End Points for Neglected Tropical Diseases?Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yannick Niamsi-EmalioCentre for Research on Filariasis and other Tropical Diseases (CRFilMT), Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Hugues C Nana-DjeungaCentre for Research on Filariasis and other Tropical Diseases (CRFilMT), Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Cédric B ChesnaisInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), UMI233/INSERM U1175, Université de Montpellier , Montpellier, France.
Sébastien D S PionInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), UMI233/INSERM U1175, Université de Montpellier , Montpellier, France.
Jules B Tchatchueng-MbouguaService d'Epidémiologie, Centre Pasteur du Cameroun, Membre du Réseau International des Instituts Pasteur, Yaoundé, Cameroun.
Michel BoussinesqInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), UMI233/INSERM U1175, Université de Montpellier , Montpellier, France.
María-Gloria BasáñezMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis and London Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, Dep artment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5031-3361
Joseph KamgnoCentre for Research on Filariasis and other Tropical Diseases (CRFilMT), Yaoundé, Cameroon.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diagnostic gold standard for onchocerciasis relies on identification and enumeration of (skin-dwelling) Onchocerca volvulus microfilariae (mf) using the skin snip technique (SST). In a recent study, blood-borne Loa loa mf were found by SST in individuals heavily infected with L. loa, and microscopically misidentified as O. volvulus due to their superficially similar morphology. This study investigates the relationship between L. loa microfilarial density (Loa MFD) and the probability of testing SST positive.

methodsA total of 1053 participants from the (onchocerciasis and loiasis coendemic) East Region in Cameroon were tested for (1) Loa MFD in blood samples, (2) O. volvulus presence by SST, and (3) Immunoglobulin (Ig) G4 antibody positivity to Ov16 by rapid diagnostic test (RDT). A Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model was used to perform a supervised classification of SST status and identify a Loa MFD threshold above which it is highly likely to find L. loa mf in skin snips.

resultsOf 1011 Ov16-negative individuals, 28 (2.8%) tested SST positive and 150 (14.8%) were L. loa positive. The range of Loa MFD was 0-85 200 mf/mL. The CART model subdivided the sample into 2 Loa MFD classes with a discrimination threshold of 4080 (95% CI, 2180-12 240) mf/mL. The probability of being SST positive exceeded 27% when Loa MFD was >4080 mf/mL.

conclusionsThe probability of finding L. loa mf by SST increases significantly with Loa MFD. Skin-snip polymerase chain reaction would be useful when monitoring onchocerciasis prevalence by SST in onchocerciasis-loiasis coendemic areas.

Indexed as

LoiasisOnchocerciasisAnimalsCameroonHumansIvermectinLoaMicrofilariaeSkinIvermectinclassification and regression tree modeldiagnosisLoa loaOnchocerca volvulusskin snip technique

Identifiers

PMID33909066
PMCPMC8201578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.