Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33909051›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2021

Patient-reported outcome measurement of symptom distress is feasible in most clinical scenarios in palliative care: an observational study involving routinely collected data.

Sabina Clapham, Barbara A Daveson, Samuel F Allingham, Darcy Morris, Pippa Blackburn, Claire E Johnson, Kathy Eagar

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sabina ClaphamPalliative Care Outcomes Collaboration, Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Building 234 (iC Enterprise 1), Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5993-6768
Barbara A DavesonPalliative Care Outcomes Collaboration, Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Building 234 (iC Enterprise 1), Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Samuel F AllinghamPalliative Care Outcomes Collaboration, Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Building 234 (iC Enterprise 1), Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Darcy MorrisPalliative Care Outcomes Collaboration, Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Building 234 (iC Enterprise 1), Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Pippa BlackburnPalliative Care Outcomes Collaboration, Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Building 234 (iC Enterprise 1), Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Claire E JohnsonPalliative Care Outcomes Collaboration, Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Building 234 (iC Enterprise 1), Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Kathy EagarPalliative Care Outcomes Collaboration, Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Building 234 (iC Enterprise 1), Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
University of Wollongong · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementation of routinely collected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) ensures patients' priorities are at the forefront of care planning and helps to standardize approaches to quality improvement. In palliative care, barriers to PROMs are widely known but what are not understood are the clinical and care settings in which patients are more likely to report and when proxy reporting is needed.

objectiveTo examine the incidence of patient-reported symptom distress compared to the incidence of proxy reporting in palliative care and influencing factors.

methodsA national observational study using routinely collected PROMs data with influencing factors investigated by logistic regression modelling. Participants were patients with an advanced life-limiting illness receiving palliative care in an inpatient or a community healthcare setting in Australia.

resultsSixteen thousand one hundred and fifty-eight reports of symptom distress were collected from 1117 patients seen by 21 palliative care services. The majority of respondents were diagnosed with cancer (76%), were older (≥65 years, 72%) and had nominated English as their first language (88%). The majority of symptom distress reports were completed by patients (61%). The odds of a patient providing a self-report where grater when they were receiving community versus inpatient palliative care (odds ratio (OR): 3.0; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.25-4.01), for patients diagnosed with malignant versus non-malignant disease (OR 1.7; 95% CI: 1.26-2.31), and for those who required an urgent change in their care plan versus those whose symptoms and problems were adequately managed (OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.04-1.83).

conclusionThree factors are associated with an increased likelihood of patient versus proxy reporting in palliative care: healthcare setting, diagnosis, and the acuity and urgency of the patient's clinical needs. PROMs are feasible in most clinical scenarios in palliative care, including when an urgent clinical response is required.

Indexed as

Palliative CarePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRoutinely Collected Health DataSymptom AssessmentAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleProxycaregiverspalliative carepatient-reported outcome measuresproxysymptom assessment

Identifiers

PMID33909051
PMCPMC8132729
OpenAlexW3158952084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.