Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33909014›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of hypertension2022

Differences in Hypertension Prevalence and Hypertension Control by Urbanization Among Adults in the United States, 2013-2018.

Yechiam Ostchega, Jeffery P Hughes, Guangyu Zhang, Tatiana Nwankwo, Jessica Graber, Duong T Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of hypertension, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yechiam OstchegaDivision of Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3598-0999
Jeffery P HughesDivision of Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA.
Guangyu ZhangDivision of Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA.
Tatiana NwankwoDivision of Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA.
Jessica GraberDivision of Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA.
Duong T NguyenDivision of Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo examine the associations between urbanization and hypertension, stage II hypertension, and hypertension control.

methodsData on 16,360 US adults aged 18 years or older from the 2013-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were used to estimate the prevalence of hypertension (blood pressure (BP) ≥130/80 mm Hg or use of medication for hypertension), stage II hypertension (BP ≥140/90 mm Hg), and hypertension control (BP <130/80 mm Hg among hypertensives) by urbanization, classified by levels of metropolitan statistical areas as large MSAs (population ≥1,000,000), medium to small MSAs (population 50,000-999,999), and non-MSAs (population <50,000).

resultsAll prevalence ratios (PRs) were compared with large MSAs and adjusted for demographics and risk factors. The PRs of hypertension were 1.07 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.99-1.14) for adults residing in medium to small MSAs and 1.06 (95% CI = 0.99-1.13) for adults residing in non-MSAs. For stage II hypertension, the PRs were higher for adults residing in medium to small MSAs 1.21 (95% CI = 1.06-1.36) but not for adults residing in non-MSAs 1.06 (95% CI = 0.88-1.29). For hypertension control, the PRs were 0.96 (95% CI = 0.91-1.01) for adults residing in medium to small MSAs and 1.00 (95% CI = 0.93-1.06) for adults residing in non-MSAs.

conclusionsAmong US adults, urbanization was associated with stage II hypertension.

Indexed as

HypertensionUrbanizationAdolescentAdultBlood PressureHumansNutrition SurveysPrevalenceRisk FactorsUnited Statesblood pressurehypertensionhypertension controlhypertension stage IINHANESurbanization

Identifiers

PMID33909014
PMCPMC8897826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.