Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33908886›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

A Live Video Program to Prevent Chronic Pain and Disability in At-Risk Adults With Acute Orthopedic Injuries (Toolkit for Optimal Recovery): Protocol for a Multisite Feasibility Study.

Ana-Maria Vranceanu, Jafar Bakhshaie, Mira Reichman, James Doorley, A Rani Elwy, Cale Jacobs, Neal Chen, John Esposito, David Laverty, Paul E Matuszewski and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ana-Maria VranceanuIntegrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3994-6488
Jafar BakhshaieIntegrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5906-1292
Mira ReichmanIntegrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4338-6674
James DoorleyIntegrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9080-4915
A Rani ElwyDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7088-3118
Cale JacobsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9300-5550
Neal ChenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8967-9018
John EspositoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7539-808X
David LavertyDepartment of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0009-5508
Paul E MatuszewskiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1340-0412
Amirreza FatehiDepartment of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6033-7834
Lucy C BowersDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9167-5550
Mitchel HarrisDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7003-6138
David RingDepartment of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6506-4879

Funding

Toolkit for Optimal Recovery after Orthopedic Injury; A multi-site feasibility study to prevent persistent pain and disabilityR01AT010462 · NCCIH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI VRANCEANU, ANA-MARIA · 2021 to 2023
$2.4M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT010462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the pivotal role of psychosocial factors in pain and disability after orthopedic injury, there are no evidence-based preventive interventions targeting psychosocial factors in patients with acute orthopedic injuries. We developed the first mind-body intervention focused on optimizing recovery and improving pain and disability in patients with acute orthopedic injuries who exhibit high levels of catastrophic thinking about pain and/or pain anxiety (Toolkit for Optimal Recovery [TOR] after orthopedic injury). In a pilot single-site randomized controlled trial (RCT), the TOR met a priori set benchmarks for feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction. The next step in developing TOR is to conduct a multisite feasibility RCT to set the stage for a scientifically rigorous hybrid efficacy-effectiveness trial.

objectiveThe objective of this study is to conduct a rigorous multisite feasibility RCT of TOR to determine whether the intervention and study methodology meet a priori set benchmarks necessary for the successful implementation of a future multisite hybrid efficacy-effectiveness trial. In this paper, we describe the study design, manualized treatments, and specific strategies used to conduct this multisite feasibility RCT investigation.

methodsThis study will be conducted at 3 geographically diverse level 1 trauma centers, anonymized as sites A, B, and C. We will conduct a multisite feasibility RCT of TOR versus the minimally enhanced usual care (MEUC) control (60 patients per site; 30 per arm) targeting a priori set feasibility benchmarks. Adult patients with acute orthopedic injuries who endorse high pain catastrophizing or pain anxiety will be recruited approximately 1-2 months after injury or surgery (baseline). Participants randomized to the TOR will receive a 4-session mind-body treatment delivered via a secure live video by trained clinical psychologists. Participants randomized to the MEUC will receive an educational booklet. Primary outcomes include feasibility of recruitment, appropriateness, feasibility of data collection, acceptability of TOR (adherence to sessions), and treatment satisfaction across all sites. We will also collect data on secondary implementation outcomes, as well as pain severity, physical and emotional function, coping skills, and adverse events. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, posttreatment, and at the 3-month follow-up.

resultsEnrollment for the RCT is estimated to begin in June 2021. The target date of completion of the feasibility RCT is April 2024. The institutional review board approval has been obtained (January 2020).

conclusionsThis investigation examines the multisite feasibility of TOR administered via live videoconferencing in adult patients with acute orthopedic injuries. If feasible, the next step is a multisite, hybrid efficacy-effectiveness trial of TOR versus MEUC. Preventive psychosocial interventions can provide a new way to improve patient and provider satisfaction and decrease suffering and health care costs among patients with orthopedic injuries who are at risk for chronic pain and disability. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/28155.

Indexed as

chronic paindisabilityinterventionmobile phonemusculoskeletalorthopedicpreventiontelehealthvideo

Identifiers

PMID33908886
PMCPMC8116990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.