ArticleThe Journal of urology2021
Optimizing Spatial Biopsy Sampling for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.
Article in The Journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Refining biopsy strategies stratified by PI-RADS score in men: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Nature communications · 2026Pooled it
- Transrectal vs transperineal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BJU international · 2026Pooled it
- Comprehensive Evaluation of Targeted and Perilesional Biopsy in Biopsy-Naïve Patients With Prostate Positive Magnetic Resonance Imaging: PERI-PRO Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.The Journal of urology · 2026Trial
- Spatial Distribution of Prostate Cancer Missed by MRI-Targeted Biopsy, Effect of a Perilesional Template, and Restaging in a Radical Prostatectomy Cohort.The Prostate · 2026Article
- The evolving PI-RADS paradigm.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Review
- Poking Around: A Comparative Study of Complications in Trans-rectal Versus Trans-perineal Prostate Biopsies.Cureus · 2025Article
- Performance of MR fusion biopsy, systematic biopsy and combined biopsy on prostate cancer detection rate in 1229 patients stratified by PI-RADSv2 score on 3T multi-parametric MRI.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Biopsy strategies in the era of mpMRI: a comprehensive review.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Review
- Three-dimensional spatial localization and volume estimation of prostate tumors usingEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Optimizing the strategies to perform prostate biopsy in MRI-positive patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Personalized prostate biopsy protocols: enhancing cancer detection through tailored approaches-a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Review
- Likelihood of sampling prostate cancer at systematic biopsy as a function of gland volume and number of cores.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Article
- [Diagnostic efficacy of targeted biopsy combined with regional systematic biopsy in prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS 4-5].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Diagnostic performance of regional systematic biopsy for prostate cancer stratified by PI-RADS and histologic zones.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- A PSMA PET/CT-based risk model for prediction of concordance between targeted biopsy and combined biopsy in detecting prostate cancer.World journal of urology · 2024Article
- The Lancet Commission on prostate cancer: planning for the surge in cases.Lancet (London, England) · 2024Review
- The impact of mpMRI-targeted vs systematic biopsy on the risk of prostate cancer downgrading at final pathology.World journal of urology · 2024Article
- A novel biopsy scheme for prostate cancer: targeted and regional systematic biopsy.BMC urology · 2024Article
- Assessment of diagnostic value of unilateral systematic biopsy combined with targeted biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe appropriate number of systematic biopsy cores to retrieve during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted prostate biopsy is not well defined. We aimed to demonstrate a biopsy sampling approach that reduces required core count while maintaining diagnostic performance. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe collected data from a cohort of 971 men who underwent MRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy for suspected prostate cancer. A regional targeted biopsy (RTB) was evaluated retrospectively; only cores within 2 cm of the margin of a radiologist-defined region of interest were considered part of the RTB. We compared detection rates for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and cancer upgrading rate on final whole mount pathology after prostatectomy between RTB, combined, MRI-targeted, and systematic biopsy.
resultsA total of 16,459 total cores from 971 men were included in the study data sets, of which 1,535 (9%) contained csPCa. The csPCa detection rates for systematic, MRI-targeted, combined, and RTB were 27.0% (262/971), 38.3% (372/971), 44.8% (435/971), and 44.0% (427/971), respectively. Combined biopsy detected significantly more csPCa than systematic and MRI-targeted biopsy (p <0.001 and p=0.004, respectively) but was similar to RTB (p=0.71), which used on average 3.8 (22%) fewer cores per patient. In 102 patients who underwent prostatectomy, there was no significant difference in upgrading rates between RTB and combined biopsy (p=0.84).
conclusionsA RTB approach can maintain state-of-the-art detection rates while requiring fewer retrieved cores. This result informs decision making about biopsy site selection and total retrieved core count.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.