Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33908665›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2021

Evaluating four motivation-phase intervention components for use with primary care patients unwilling to quit smoking: a randomized factorial experiment.

Jessica W Cook, Timothy B Baker, Michael C Fiore, Linda M Collins, Megan E Piper, Tanya R Schlam, Daniel M Bolt, Stevens S Smith, Deejay Zwaga, Douglas E Jorenby and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Representativeness of Electronic Referral to Smoking Treatment Trials in Adult Primary Care.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jessica W CookCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9631-6637
Timothy B BakerCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Michael C FioreCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Linda M CollinsDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4282-8722
Megan E PiperCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Tanya R SchlamCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4947-8051
Daniel M BoltDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin, WI, USA.
Stevens S SmithCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Deejay ZwagaCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Douglas E JorenbyCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Robin MermelsteinInstitute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Testing Relapse Recovery Intervention ComponentsP01CA180945 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI COOK, JESSICA MEGAN · 2014 to 2023
$23.0M
Pilot, Mentoring, and Professional Development CoreP50DA039838 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI COLLINS, LINDA M · 2015 to 2019
$13.9M
Using MOST to optimize an HIV care continuum intervention for vulnerable populationsR01DA040480 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI COLLINS, LINDA M, GWADZ, MARYA · 2016 to 2020
$5.9M
Opt-IN: Optimizing INtensive Lifestyle Intervention for Weight LossR01DK097364 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI COLLINS, LINDA M, SPRING, BONNIE · 2012 to 2016
$3.0M
Engineering an Online STI Prevention ProgramR01AA022931 · NIAAA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI RULISON, KELLY LIN · 2015 to 2019
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA180945NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA022931NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA022931NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA039838NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040480NIDA NIH HHS R01DA040480NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK097364NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK097364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo assess the effectiveness of intervention components designed to increase quit attempts and promote abstinence in patients initially unwilling to quit smoking.

designA four-factor, randomized factorial experiment.

settingSixteen primary care clinics in southern Wisconsin.

participantsA total of 577 adults who smoke (60% women, 80% White) recruited during primary care visits who were currently willing to reduce their smoking but unwilling to try to quit. Interventions Four factors contrasted intervention components administered over a 1-year period: (i) nicotine mini-lozenge versus none; (ii) reduction counseling versus none; (iii) behavioral activation (BA) counseling versus none; and (iv) motivational 5Rs counseling versus none. Participants could request cessation treatment at any time. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was 7-day point-prevalence abstinence at 52 weeks post enrollment; secondary outcomes were point-prevalence abstinence at 26 weeks and making a quit attempt by weeks 26 and 52.

findingsNo abstinence main effects were found but a mini-lozenge × reduction counseling × BA interaction was found at 52 weeks; P = 0.03. Unpacking this interaction showed that the mini-lozenge alone produced the highest abstinence rate (16.7%); combining it with reduction counseling produced an especially low abstinence rate (4.1%). Reduction counseling decreased the likelihood of making a quit attempt by 52 weeks relative to no reduction counseling (P = 0.01).

conclusionsNicotine mini-lozenges may increase smoking abstinence in people initially unwilling to quit smoking, but their effectiveness declines when used with smoking reduction counseling or other behavioral interventions. Reduction counseling decreases the likelihood of making a quit attempt in people initially unwilling to quit smoking.

Indexed as

MotivationSmoking CessationHumansPrimary Health CareSmokingWisconsinChronic care smoking treatmentcomparative effectivenessfactorial experimentmotivation phasemultiphase optimization strategy (MOST)primary carequit attemptssmoking cessationsmoking reductionunwilling to quit smoking

Identifiers

PMID33908665
PMCPMC8492501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.