Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33908637›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pharmacology2021

Pharmacological Predictors of Morbidity and Mortality in COVID-19.

Christopher Oddy, James McCaul, Polly Keeling, Jonathan Allington, Dhanuja Senn, Neesha Soni, Hannah Morrison, Ruwani Mawella, Thomas Samuel, John Dixon

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher OddySt Helier Hospital, Wrythe Lane, Sutton, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2311-9261
James McCaulSt Helier Hospital, Wrythe Lane, Sutton, London, UK.
Polly KeelingSt Helier Hospital, Wrythe Lane, Sutton, London, UK.
Jonathan AllingtonSt Helier Hospital, Wrythe Lane, Sutton, London, UK.
Dhanuja SennSt Helier Hospital, Wrythe Lane, Sutton, London, UK.
Neesha SoniSt Helier Hospital, Wrythe Lane, Sutton, London, UK.
Hannah MorrisonSt Helier Hospital, Wrythe Lane, Sutton, London, UK.
Ruwani MawellaSt Helier Hospital, Wrythe Lane, Sutton, London, UK.
Thomas SamuelSt Helier Hospital, Wrythe Lane, Sutton, London, UK.
John DixonSt Helier Hospital, Wrythe Lane, Sutton, London, UK.
St Helier Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interaction of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) with the majority of common prescriptions is broadly unknown. The purpose of this study is to identify medications associated with altered disease outcomes in COVID-19. A retrospective cohort composed of all adult inpatient admissions to our center with COVID-19 was analyzed. Data concerning all antecedent prescriptions were collected and agents brought forward for analysis if prescribed to at least 20 patients in our cohort. Forty-two medications and 22 classes of medication were examined. Groups were propensity score matched and analyzed by logistic and linear regression. The majority of medications did not show a statistically significant relationship with altered disease outcomes. Lower mortality was associated with use of pregabalin (hazard ratio [HR], 0.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.92; P = .049) and inhalers of any type (HR, 0.33; 95%CI, 0.14-0.80; P = .015), specifically beclomethasone (HR, 0.10; 95%CI, 0.01-0.82; P = .032), tiotropium (HR, 0.07; 95%CI, 0.01-0.83; P = .035), and steroid-containing inhalers (HR, 0.35; 95%CI, 0.15-0.79; P = .013). Gliclazide (HR, 4.37; 95%CI, 1.26-15.18; P = .020) and proton pump inhibitor (HR, 1.72; 95%CI, 1.06-2.79; P = .028) use was associated with greater mortality. Diuretic (HR, 0.07; 95%CI, 0.01-0.37; P = .002) and statin (HR, 0.35; 95%CI, 0.17-0.73; P = .006) use was associated with lower rates of critical care admission. Our data lends confidence to observing usual practice in patients with COVID-19 by continuing antecedent prescriptions in the absence of an alternative acute contraindication. We highlight potential benefits in investigation of diuretics, inhalers, pregabalin, and statins as therapeutic agents for COVID-19 and support further assessment of the safety of gliclazide and proton pump inhibitors in the acute illness.

Indexed as

COVID-19Prescription DrugsAgedCOVID-19 TestingCritical Care OutcomesFemaleHospitalizationHumansMalePropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSARS-CoV-2Severity of Illness IndexUnited KingdomPrescription DrugsCOVID-19medicationsprescriptionspropensity score matchedSARS-CoV-2severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

Identifiers

PMID33908637
PMCPMC8242508
OpenAlexW3158243805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.