Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33908347›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

Optimal evolutionary decision-making to store immune memory.

Oskar H Schnaack, Armita Nourmohammad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Design principles of the cytotoxic CD8Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Design principles of the cytotoxic CD8bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Two complementary features of humoral immune memory confer protection against the same or variant antigens.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Affinity maturation for an optimal balance between long-term immune coverage and short-term resource constraints.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Oskar H SchnaackMax Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-organization, Göttingen, Germany.
Armita NourmohammadMax Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-organization, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6245-3553

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adaptive immune system provides a diverse set of molecules that can mount specific responses against a multitude of pathogens. Memory is a key feature of adaptive immunity, which allows organisms to respond more readily upon re-infections. However, differentiation of memory cells is still one of the least understood cell fate decisions. Here, we introduce a mathematical framework to characterize optimal strategies to store memory to maximize the utility of immune response over an organism's lifetime. We show that memory production should be actively regulated to balance between affinity and cross-reactivity of immune receptors for an effective protection against evolving pathogens. Moreover, we predict that specificity of memory should depend on the organism's lifespan, and shorter lived organisms with fewer pathogenic encounters should store more cross-reactive memory. Our framework provides a baseline to gauge the efficacy of immune memory in light of an organism's coevolutionary history with pathogens.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionImmunologic MemoryAdaptive ImmunityAnimalsHumansModels, Theoreticaladaptive immune systemevolutionary optimizationimmune memorynon-equilibrium decision makingphysics of living systems

Identifiers

PMID33908347
PMCPMC8116052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.