Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33908058›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2021

Effects of Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis 420 on gastrointestinal inflammation induced by a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial.

Sanna M Mäkelä, Sofia D Forssten, Marita Kailajärvi, Ville L Langén, Mika Scheinin, Kirsti Tiihonen, Arthur C Ouwehand

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sanna M MäkeläDanisco Sweeteners Oy, IFF Health & Biosciences, ,Sokeritehtaantie 20, Kantvik, FI-02460, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4116-5007
Sofia D ForsstenDanisco Sweeteners Oy, IFF Health & Biosciences, ,Sokeritehtaantie 20, Kantvik, FI-02460, Finland.
Marita KailajärviClinical Research Services Turku (CRST) Oy and Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Ville L LangénClinical Research Services Turku (CRST) Oy and Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Mika ScheininClinical Research Services Turku (CRST) Oy and Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Kirsti TiihonenDanisco Sweeteners Oy, IFF Health & Biosciences, ,Sokeritehtaantie 20, Kantvik, FI-02460, Finland.
Arthur C OuwehandDanisco Sweeteners Oy, IFF Health & Biosciences, ,Sokeritehtaantie 20, Kantvik, FI-02460, Finland.
Etelä-Karjalan sosiaali ja terveyspiiri · FIUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsUse of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can cause damage to the gastric and duodenal mucosa. Some probiotics have proven useful in ameliorating the harmful side-effects of NSAIDs. Our aim was to evaluate whether oral administration of Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis 420 (B420) can attenuate the increase of calprotectin excretion into faeces induced by intake of diclofenac sustained-release tablets.

methodsA double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled and randomized clinical study was performed in 50 healthy male and female volunteers aged 20-40 years, in Finland. Study participation consisted of 4 phases: run-in, intervention with B420 or placebo, B420 or placebo + NSAID treatment, and follow-up. The primary outcome was the concentration of calprotectin in faeces. Secondary outcomes were haemoglobin and microbial DNA in faeces and blood haemoglobin levels.

resultsIntake of diclofenac increased the faecal excretion of calprotectin in both groups. The observed increases were 48.19 ± 61.55 μg/g faeces (mean ± standard deviation) in the B420 group and 31.30 ± 39.56 μg/g in the placebo group (difference estimate 16.90; 95% confidence interval: -14.00, 47.77; P = .276). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups in changes of faecal or blood haemoglobin. Faecal B. lactis DNA was much more abundant in the B420 group compared to the placebo group (ANOVA estimate for treatment difference 0.85 × 10

conclusionsShort-term administration of the probiotic B420 did not protect the healthy adult study participants from diclofenac-induced gastrointestinal inflammation as determined by analysis of faecal calprotectin levels.

Indexed as

Bifidobacterium animalisProbioticsAdultAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDouble-Blind MethodFecesFemaleHumansInflammationMaleYoung AdultAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidalclinical trialgastrointestinal inflammationnonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugprobiotic

Identifiers

PMID33908058
PMCPMC9291844
OpenAlexW3157314992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.