ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
The heterogeneous impact of environmental regulation on urban green scale economy: an empirical analysis based on city-level panel data in China.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Environmental regulation effect on the different technology innovation-based the empirical analysis.PloS one · 2024Article
- Can carbon emissions trading policy promote product bargaining power increases for high-carbon enterprises? Evidence from China.PloS one · 2024Article
- Do Environmental Regulations Facilitate a Low-Carbon Transformation in China's Resource-Based Cities?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With continued expansions of scale, the Chinese cities are facing unprecedented economic, environmental, and energy sustainability challenges. The aim of this paper is to examine the heterogeneous impact of environmental regulation (ER) on urban green scale economy (GSEC), by combining the global Malmquist index approach, spatial econometric model, panel quantile regression model (QRPD), and the city-level panel data from 2004 to 2018. The estimation results show that (1) from 2004 to 2018, the growth rate of GSEC fluctuates sharply, and the values of GSEC are less than 1 in many years. This indicates that GSEC is far from efficient and needs to be improved in the future; (2) the results of the spatial econometric model show that GSEC has a U-shaped relationship with the level of ER. Furthermore, the estimation results of QRPD verify the above conclusions and show that there is distinct heterogeneity of ER on GSEC at different quantiles and regional cities; (3) the results further indicate that other vital control variables have a significant and heterogeneous effect on GSEC. Therefore, the focus of future work should be adapted to local conditions. Specifically, in the cities with lower-level GSEC, the policymakers should give top priority to break through the U-shaped inflection point as soon as possible and help enterprises to achieve pollution reduction by technical and financial subsidies. While in the cities with higher-level GSEC, the government should further strengthen its ER and encourage competition among enterprises by internal technological innovation. In addition, the government should try to avoid the negative effect of the "resource curse" trap, excessive financial leverage, and "race-to-the-bottom" phenomenon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33907959What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.