Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33907875›Full record

ArticlePediatric cardiology2021

Diagnosing Atrial Septal Defect from Electrocardiogram with Deep Learning.

Hiroki Mori, Kei Inai, Hisashi Sugiyama, Yoshihiro Muragaki

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Role of artificial intelligence in congenital heart disease.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Role of Artificial Intelligence in Congenital Heart Disease and Interventions.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Deep learning in precision medicine and focus on glioma.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hiroki MoriDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-0054, Japan.
Kei InaiDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-0054, Japan.
Hisashi SugiyamaDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-0054, Japan.
Yoshihiro MuragakiInstitute of Advanced BioMedical Engineering and Science, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, 162-0054, Japan. ymuragaki@twmu.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The heart murmur associated with atrial septal defects is often faint and can thus only be detected by chance. Although electrocardiogram examination can prompt diagnoses, identification of specific findings remains a major challenge. We demonstrate improved diagnostic accuracy realized by incorporating a proposed deep learning model, comprising a convolutional neural network (CNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM), with electrocardiograms. This retrospective observational study included 1192 electrocardiograms of 728 participants from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2017, at Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital. Using echocardiography, we confirmed the status of healthy subjects-no structural heart disease-and the diagnosis of atrial septal defects in patients. We used a deep learning model comprising a CNN and LTSMs. All pediatric cardiologists (n = 12) were blinded to patient groupings when analyzing them by electrocardiogram. Using electrocardiograms, the model's diagnostic ability was compared with that of pediatric cardiologists. We assessed 1192 electrocardiograms (828 normally structured hearts and 364 atrial septal defects) pertaining to 792 participants. The deep learning model results revealed that the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and F1 score were 0.89, 0.76, 0.96, 0.88, and 0.81, respectively. The pediatric cardiologists (n = 12) achieved means of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and F1 score of 0.58 ± 0.06, 0.53 ± 0.04, 0.67 ± 0.10, 0.69 ± 0.18, and 0.58 ± 0.06, respectively. The proposed method is a superior alternative to accurately diagnose atrial septal defects.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerChildEchocardiographyElectrocardiographyFemaleHeart Septal Defects, AtrialHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesAtrial septal defectDeep learningElectrocardiogram

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.