ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2021
Body Mass Index and Mortality Among Adults With Incident Myocardial Infarction.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- "We adjusted for race": now what? A systematic review of utilization and reporting of race in American Journal of Epidemiology and Epidemiology, 2020-2021.Epidemiologic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Joint effects of severe obesity and inflammation on mortality in critically ill non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a cohort study with external validation.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Association between BMI and cause-specific long-term mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Article
- Extremes of both weight gain and weight loss are associated with increased incidence of heart failure and cardiovascular death: evidence from the CANVAS Program and CREDENCE.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2023Article
- Lifestyle and the risk of acute coronary event: a retrospective study of patients after myocardial infarction.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Effects of weight change on all causes, digestive system and other causes mortality in Southern Italy: a competing risk approach.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The relationship between body mass index (BMI; weight (kg)/height (m)2) and mortality among survivors of myocardial infarction (MI) remains controversial. We examined the relationships of BMI before and after MI and change in weight with all-cause mortality among participants in the Nurses' Health Study (1980-2016) and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1988-2016) cohorts. During a follow-up period of up to 36 years, we documented 4,856 participants with incident nonfatal MI, among whom 2,407 died during follow-up. For pre-MI and post-MI BMI, overweight was not associated with lower mortality. Obesity (BMI ≥30) was associated with higher risk of mortality. Compared with participants with post-MI BMI of 22.5-24.9, hazard ratios were 1.16 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01, 1.34) for BMI 30.0-34.9 and 1.52 (95% CI: 1.27, 1.83) for BMI ≥35.0 (P for trend < 0.001). Compared with stable weight from before MI to after MI, a reduction of more than 4 BMI units was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio = 1.53, 95%: CI: 1.28, 1.83). This increase was seen only among participants who lost weight without improving their physical activity or diet. Our findings showed no survival benefit of excess adiposity in relation to risk of mortality. Weight loss from before to after MI without lifestyle improvement may reflect reverse causation and disease severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.