Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33907709›Full record

ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2021

Interactive Session for Residents and Medical Students on Dermatologic Care for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Patients.

Devon L Barrett, Krittin J Supapannachart, Ramoncito L Caleon, Laura Ragmanauskaite, Patrick McCleskey, Howa Yeung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. LGBTQ+ Health Content in US Residency Curricula: A Scoping Review.Journal of graduate medical education · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Devon L BarrettThird-Year Medical Student, Department of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0002-7752-1627
Krittin J SupapannachartThird-Year Medical Student, Department of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine.
Ramoncito L CaleonThird-Year Medical Student, Department of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine.
Laura RagmanauskaiteResident, Department of Dermatology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center.
Patrick McCleskeySenior Dermatologist, Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center.
Howa YeungAssistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine; Associate Professor, Regional Telehealth Service, VA Southeast Network VISN 7.

Funding

NIAMS NIH HHS L30 AR076081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite increasing emphasis on LGBTQ health in medical education, evidence-based training on LGBTQ patient care in dermatology is lacking. We designed an interactive online didactic session on dermatologic care of LGBTQ patients for medical students and dermatology residents. Methods: Session content was based on continuing medical education articles and incorporated preexisting LGBTQ-inclusive policies, environments, and videos. We implemented the session via a web-based videoconferencing platform as part of a preexisting resident lecture series. We began with a 90-minute lecture on LGBTQ health care disparities and dermatologists' roles, best practices for providing inclusive care, and dermatologic health concerns and screening recommendations in LGBTQ populations. To solidify knowledge and promote practice of learned skills, a 30-minute interactive role-playing session followed where participants acted as observer, patient, or provider in three distinct clinical scenarios pertaining to dermatologic care of LGBTQ patients. Participants completed baseline and follow-up surveys, which included a psychometrically validated clinical skills scale and an ad hoc knowledge assessment. Results: Baseline and follow-up scores from the clinical skills scale increased overall (0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9; Discussion: An online interactive didactive session on dermatological care of LGBTQ patients increased participants' clinical preparedness and basic knowledge. Implementation of similar sessions at other institutions can improve gaps in preparing residents and medical students in dermatological care of LGBTQ patients.

Indexed as

Sexual and Gender MinoritiesStudents, MedicalTransgender PersonsFemaleGender IdentityHumansMaleSexual BehaviorCultural CompetenceCultural CompetencyDermatologyDiversityDiversity and InclusionHealth EquityInclusionLGBT HealthLGBTQ+Online/Distance LearningSexual and Gender Minorities

Identifiers

PMID33907709
PMCPMC8063631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.