Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33907590›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of selected topics in signal processing2020

A Review of Automated Speech and Language Features for Assessment of Cognitive and Thought Disorders.

Rohit Voleti, Julie M Liss, Visar Berisha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of selected topics in signal processing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Linking spontaneous speech, cognition, and psychopathology across affective and psychotic disorders: A network approach.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. An End-to-End Overview of Clinical Speech AI.IEEE transactions on audio, speech, and language processing (2025) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Everyday Language and Cognitive Functioning in Late Life.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rohit VoletiSchool of Electrical, Computer, & Energy Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281 USA.
Julie M Liss
Visar Berisha

Funding

Perception of dysarthric speech: An objective model of dysarthric speech evaluation with actionable outcomesR01DC006859 · NIDCD · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI BERISHA, VISAR, LISS, JULIE M · 2004 to 2021
$4.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely accepted that information derived from analyzing speech (the acoustic signal) and language production (words and sentences) serves as a useful window into the health of an individual's cognitive ability. In fact, most neuropsychological testing batteries have a component related to speech and language where clinicians elicit speech from patients for subjective evaluation across a broad set of dimensions. With advances in speech signal processing and natural language processing, there has been recent interest in developing tools to detect more subtle changes in cognitive-linguistic function. This work relies on extracting a set of features from recorded and transcribed speech for objective assessments of speech and language, early diagnosis of neurological disease, and tracking of disease after diagnosis. With an emphasis on cognitive and thought disorders, in this paper we provide a review of existing speech and language features used in this domain, discuss their clinical application, and highlight their advantages and disadvantages. Broadly speaking, the review is split into two categories: language features based on natural language processing and speech features based on speech signal processing. Within each category, we consider features that aim to measure complementary dimensions of cognitive-linguistics, including language diversity, syntactic complexity, semantic coherence, and timing. We conclude the review with a proposal of new research directions to further advance the field.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasecognitive linguisticsnatural language processingschizophreniathought disordersvocal biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID33907590
PMCPMC8074691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.