ReviewJournal of electroanalytical chemistry (Lausanne, Switzerland)2021
Emerging materials for the electrochemical detection of COVID-19.
Review in Journal of electroanalytical chemistry (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanomaterial-Based Biosensors for the Detection of COVID-19.Indian journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- Optimization of Electrochemical Sensitivity in Anticancer Drug Quantification through ZnS@CNS Nanosheets: Synthesis via Accelerated Sonochemical Methodology.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2024Article
- Review
- Electrochemical Wearable Biosensors and Bioelectronic Devices Based on Hydrogels: Mechanical Properties and Electrochemical Behavior.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Nano-biosensor for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 detection: methods, mechanism and interface design.RSC advances · 2023Review
- Review
- A novel electrochemical IL-6 sensor based on Au nanoparticles-modified platinum carbon electrode.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- A comparison of conventional and advanced electroanalytical methods to detect SARS-CoV-2 virus: A concise review.Chemosphere · 2022Review
- Label-free electrochemical immunosensor for highly sensitive COVID-19 spike protein detection.Sensors and actuators reports · 2022Article
- Electrochemical biosensors for SARS-CoV-2 detection: Voltametric or impedimetric transduction?Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Review
- Performance of electrochemical immunoassays for clinical diagnostics of SARS-CoV-2 based on selective nucleocapsid N protein detection: Boron-doped diamond, gold and glassy carbon evaluation.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2022Article
- A review on the recent achievements on coronaviruses recognition using electrochemical detection methods.Microchemical journal : devoted to the application of microtechniques in all branches of science · 2022Review
- Electrochemical biosensors for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 pathogen and protein biomarkers.International journal of electrochemical science · 2022Review
- Rapid SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis using disposable strips and a metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor platform.Journal of vacuum science and technology. B, Nanotechnology & microelectronics : materials, processing, measurement, & phenomena : JVST B · 2022Article
- Electrochemical sensors for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus.Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) · 2022Article
- Smart and emerging nanomaterials-based biosensor for SARS-CoV-2 detection.Materials letters · 2022Article
- Emerging Biosensors to Detect Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): A Review.Biosensors · 2021Review
- Aptamer Applications in Emerging Viral Diseases.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Nanotechnology-based approaches in the fight against SARS-CoV-2.AIMS microbiology · 2021Review
- Bioelectrochemical platforms to study and detect emerging pathogens.MRS bulletin · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 virus is still causing a dramatic loss of human lives worldwide, constituting an unprecedented challenge for the society, public health and economy, to overcome. The up-to-date diagnostic tests, PCR, antibody ELISA and Rapid Antigen, require special equipment, hours of analysis and special staff. For this reason, many research groups have focused recently on the design and development of electrochemical biosensors for the SARS-CoV-2 detection, indicating that they can play a significant role in controlling COVID disease. In this review we thoroughly discuss the transducer electrode nanomaterials investigated in order to improve the sensitivity, specificity and response time of the as-developed SARS-CoV-2 electrochemical biosensors. Particularly, we mainly focus on the results appeard on Au-based and carbon or graphene-based electrodes, which are the main material groups recently investigated worldwidely. Additionally, the adopted electrochemical detection techniques are also discussed, highlighting their pros and cos. The nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors could enable a fast, accurate and without special cost, virus detection. However, further research is required in terms of new nanomaterials and synthesis strategies in order the SARS-CoV-2 electrochemical biosensors to be commercialized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.