Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33907530›Full record

ArticleDigital journal of ophthalmology : DJO2021

Flipped ophthalmology classroom augmented with case-based learning.

Ryan J Diel, Kelly H Yom, David Ramirez, Karam Alawa, Justine Cheng, Salma Dawoud, Michelle R Snyder, Pavlina S Kemp

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital journal of ophthalmology : DJO, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryan J DielDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
Kelly H YomDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
David RamirezDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
Karam AlawaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
Justine ChengDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
Salma DawoudDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
Michelle R SnyderDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
Pavlina S KempDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the flipped classroom model provides an effective way to teach ophthalmology to medical students, there are concerns that it overburdens the learner. The purpose of this study was to assess medical students' perceptions of a case-based flipped classroom style compared with a traditional didactic lecture series and to evaluate the effects of case-based learning on students' confidence in managing common ophthalmic complaints.

methodsWe created an interactive, case-based flipped classroom ophthalmology curriculum. Paired pre- and post-clerkship surveys were distributed to students on the first and last day of the 2-week clerkship. Questions were formatted as statements using a 6-point Likert scale to assess students' prior exposure to a flipped classroom, perceptions of the flipped classroom curriculum, and confidence in evaluating ophthalmic complaints.

resultsA total of 75 students were included during the period July 2019 to March 2020. Pre-clerkship questionnaires revealed no preference for either teaching modality. Wilcoxon signed-rank testing comparing pre- and post-clerkship data revealed a significant increase in students' favoring the case-based flipped-classroom model. Participants reported significant reductions in pressure to perform, course burden, and overall anxiety as well as increased confidence in triaging common eye complaints.

conclusionsThe case-based flipped classroom modality prioritizes key learning objectives while increasing student participation and confidence. The reproducibility and accessibility of standardized prepared video lectures and cases may help institutions to better incorporate ophthalmology into preexisting rotations.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducation, MedicalFemaleHumansLearningMaleOphthalmologyReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesStudents, MedicalSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33907530
PMCPMC8051162
OpenAlexW3155107593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.