Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33907414›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2021

Deep Learning Classifier with Patient's Metadata of Dermoscopic Images in Malignant Melanoma Detection.

Dina Nur Anggraini Ningrum, Sheng-Po Yuan, Woon-Man Kung, Chieh-Chen Wu, I-Shiang Tzeng, Chu-Ya Huang, Jack Yu-Chuan Li, Yao-Chin Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. CROPro: a tool for automated cropping of prostate magnetic resonance images.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Dina Nur Anggraini NingrumGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8557-2862
Sheng-Po YuanGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3515-3480
Woon-Man KungDepartment of Exercise and Health Promotion, College of Kinesiology and Health, Chinese Culture University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8311-2902
Chieh-Chen WuDepartment of Exercise and Health Promotion, College of Kinesiology and Health, Chinese Culture University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-2205-5849
I-Shiang TzengDepartment of Exercise and Health Promotion, College of Kinesiology and Health, Chinese Culture University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9047-8141
Chu-Ya HuangTaiwan College of Healthcare Executives, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jack Yu-Chuan Li *Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6497-4232
Yao-Chin Wang *Graduate Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, College of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0094-8016
Chinese Culture University · TWInstitute of Informatics of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKMin Sheng General Hospital · TWState University of Semarang · IDTaiwan College of Healthcare Executive · TWWan Fang Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncidence of skin cancer is one of the global burdens of malignancies that increase each year, with melanoma being the deadliest one. Imaging-based automated skin cancer detection still remains challenging owing to variability in the skin lesions and limited standard dataset availability. Recent research indicates the potential of deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) in predicting outcomes from simple as well as highly complicated images. However, its implementation requires high-class computational facility, that is not feasible in low resource and remote areas of health care. There is potential in combining image and patient's metadata, but the study is still lacking.

objectiveWe want to develop malignant melanoma detection based on dermoscopic images and patient's metadata using an artificial intelligence (AI) model that will work on low-resource devices.

methodsWe used an open-access dermatology repository of International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) Archive dataset consist of 23,801 biopsy-proven dermoscopic images. We tested performance for binary classification malignant melanomas vs nonmalignant melanomas. From 1200 sample images, we split the data for training (72%), validation (18%), and testing (10%). We compared CNN with image data only (CNN model) vs CNN for image data combined with an artificial neural network (ANN) for patient's metadata (CNN+ANN model).

resultsThe balanced accuracy for CNN+ANN model was higher (92.34%) than the CNN model (73.69%). Combination of the patient's metadata using ANN prevents the overfitting that occurs in the CNN model using dermoscopic images only. This small size (24 MB) of this model made it possible to run on a medium class computer without the need of cloud computing, suitable for deployment on devices with limited resources.

conclusionThe CNN+ANN model can increase the accuracy of classification in malignant melanoma detection even with limited data and is promising for development as a screening device in remote and low resources health care.

Indexed as

artificial neural networkconvolutional neural networkembedded artificial intelligenceskin cancer

Identifiers

PMID33907414
PMCPMC8071207
OpenAlexW3157022347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.