Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33907302›Full record

ReviewJournal of public health policy2021

From "learning from the field" to jointly driving change.

Joshua Galjour, Thomas Schwarz, Itai Rusike, Marta Lomazzi, Laura Hoemeke, Helen Prytherch, Teurai Rwafa-Ponela, Margaret Nanyonga, Ravi M Ram, Sunisha Neupane and 6 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of public health policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Joshua GaljourInstitute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 9 Chemin des Mines, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland. Joshua.Galjour@etu.unige.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3299-9712
Thomas SchwarzMedicus Mundi International Network, Basel, Switzerland.
Itai RusikeCommunity Working Group On Health, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Marta LomazziInstitute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 9 Chemin des Mines, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.
Laura HoemekeGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Helen PrytherchSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Teurai Rwafa-PonelaSAMRC/Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science - PRICELESS SA, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Margaret Nanyonga, Kampala, Uganda.
Ravi M RamPeople's Health Movement Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.
Sunisha NeupaneUniversity of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Peter TsasisSchool of Health Policy and Management and School of Administrative Studies, York University, Toronto, Canada.
Maryam Bibi Rumaney, Cape Town, South Africa.
Timothy AkinmureleEquitable Health Access Initiative, Lagos, Nigeria.
Michael SsemakulaHuman Rights Research Documentation Center and People's Health Movement, Kampala, Uganda.
Rituu B NandaGlobal Fund for Children and Institute of Social Studies Trust, New Delhi, India.
Emmanuel Kabengele MpingaInstitute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 9 Chemin des Mines, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The theme of the 8th edition of the Geneva Health Forum (GHF) was Improving access to health: learning from the field. While 'the field' often denotes people, patients, communities, and healthcare workers, we challenge the notion and its usage. A group of like-minded conference participants set up a working group to examine the term 'the field' and look at questions related to language, power, participation, and rights. By highlighting deficiencies of existing terms and jargon, we explain why language is a form of power that matters in public health. We describe global, regional, and national case studies that facilitate full participation to achieve more equitable health outcomes. By concluding with concrete recommendations, we hope to contribute to these shared goals: to correct power imbalances between health authorities and the people that they intend, and are expected, to serve. The authors are all members of the working group.

Indexed as

Civil societyFieldHealth policyParticipatory researchPrimary health careSocial accountability

Identifiers

PMID33907302
PMCPMC8076437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.