Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33907269›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Attitude and potential benefits of modern information and communication technology use and telemedicine in cross-sectoral solid organ transplant care.

Martin Holderried, Ansgar Hoeper, Friederike Holderried, Nils Heyne, Silvio Nadalin, Oliver Unger, Christian Ernst, Martina Guthoff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Quality of ChatGPT Responses to Questions Related To Liver Transplantation.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Telehealth Experience Among Liver and Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Mixed Methods Study.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martin HolderriedeHealth Research-Group, Department of Strategic Medical Development and Quality Management, University of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 6, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Ansgar HoepereHealth Research-Group, Department of Strategic Medical Development and Quality Management, University of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 6, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Friederike HolderriedeHealth Research-Group, Department of Strategic Medical Development and Quality Management, University of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 6, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany. f.holderried@gmx.net.
Nils HeyneDepartment of Diabetology, Endocrinology, Nephrology, Section of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Silvio NadalinDepartment of General-, Visceral- and Transplant Surgery, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Oliver UngerFaculty of Business Management and Economics, Julius-Maximilians-University, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Christian ErnstInstitute for Healthcare and Public Management, University of Hohenheim, Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Martina GuthoffDepartment of Diabetology, Endocrinology, Nephrology, Section of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DEUniversity of Hohenheim · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Situations like the COVID-19 pandemic urgently require the implementation of eHealth for vulnerable patient populations. Here we quantitatively evaluate use and potential of modern information and communication technology (ICT) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. We conducted a structured, questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study that was addressed to patients after kidney, liver, pancreas, or combined transplantation. We focused on: sociodemographic data, present use of digital technologies in daily life and for health reasons, patients' eHealth literacy, and their overall attitude towards eHealth. A total of 234 patients completed the questionnaire. Most of the patients (90%) have a web-enabled computer, 78.2% have a smartphone, and 71.8% regularly search the internet for health-related information. Sixty-eight percent would like to receive discharge summaries online, and 54% would like to chat online with their physicians. Even though ICT use in daily life was age-related, no significant difference could be shown for health reasons or the type of transplanted organ. Modern ICT use is predominantly accepted for health reasons by SOT recipients. Regardless of the transplanted organ, a deeper integration of eHealth has potential for improving cross-sectoral care. To successfully implement eHealth technologies in cross-sectoral care future research should include online physician-patient communication, data security, data safety, and the aspects of quality and safety of care.

Indexed as

AttitudeCommunicationOrgan TransplantationTelemedicineAdultFemaleHumansInformation LiteracyInternetMiddle AgedPatientsPhysician-Patient RelationsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33907269
PMCPMC8079672
OpenAlexW3159314415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.