Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33907204›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Comparison of diagnostic value of 68 Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI and standalone MRI for the detection of intracranial meningiomas.

Heike C Einhellig, Eberhard Siebert, Hans-C Bauknecht, Anna Tietze, Josefine Graef, Christian Furth, Daniel Schulze, Milena Miszczuk, Georg Bohner, Imke Schatka and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Correlation of [EJNMMI research · 2026
    Article
  4. Molecular Brain Tumor Imaging Beyond [AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Combined SSTR2-targeted Analogue withFrontiers in oncology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Role of [Cancers · 2022
    Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Heike C EinhelligDepartment of Neuroradiology, Charité, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany. Heike.einhellig@charite.de.
Eberhard SiebertDepartment of Neuroradiology, Charité, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Hans-C BauknechtDepartment of Neuroradiology, Charité, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Anna TietzeDepartment of Neuroradiology, Charité, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Josefine GraefDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Charité, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Christian FurthDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Charité, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Daniel SchulzeDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt University, Unter den Linden 6, 10099, Berlin, Germany.
Milena MiszczukDepartment of Neuroradiology, Charité, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Georg BohnerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Charité, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Imke SchatkaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Charité, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Marcus R MakowskiDepartment of Radiology, Charité, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone in comparison to positron emission tomography/ magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) in patients with meningiomas. 57 patients with a total of 112 meningiomas of the brain were included. PET/MRI, including a fully diagnostic contrast enhanced MRI and PET, were acquired. PET/MRI was used as reference standard. The size and location of meningiomas was recorded. Likelihood-ratio chi-square tests were used to calculate p-values within logistic regression in order to compare different models. A multi-level logistic regression was applied to comply the hierarchical data structure. Multi-level regression adjusts for clustering in data was performed. The majority (n = 103) of meningiomas could be identified based on standard MRI sequences compared to PET/MRI. MRI alone achieved a sensitivity of 95% (95% CI 0.78, 0.99) and specificity of 88% (95% CI 0.58, 0.98). Based on intensity of contrast medium uptake, 97 meningiomas could be diagnosed with intense uptake (93.75%). Sensitivity was lowest with 74% for meningiomas < 0.5 cm

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overContrast MediaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMiddle AgedOctreotideOrganometallic CompoundsPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsContrast MediaGa(III)-DOTATOCOctreotideOrganometallic CompoundsRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID33907204
PMCPMC8079685
OpenAlexW3158619517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.