ArticleMicrobes and environments2021
Community Analysis-based Screening of Plant Growth-promoting Bacteria for Sugar Beet.
Article in Microbes and environments, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Host species identity, compartment, and site jointly shape the bryophyte-associated bacterial communities in subtropical area.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Effects of Inorganic Fluoride and the Fluoroquinolone Antibiotic Pefloxacin on the Growth and Microbiome Structure ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Root microorganisms enhance crop resistance to low-temperature stress by increasing antioxidant enzyme activity.Planta · 2026Article
- Distinct and Intermediate Bacterial Community Structure of the Wasabi Rhizome Based on Compartment-resolved 16S rRNA Gene Profiling.Microbes and environments · 2026Article
- Is within-field spatial variation in wheat Fusarium crown rot associated with rhizosphere microbiome and soil nutrients.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Physicochemical, microbial, and microbiome dynamics in winery waste composting.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025Article
- Insights into quinoa endophytes: core bacterial communities reveal high stability to water stress and genotypic variation.Environmental microbiome · 2025Article
- Host genotype-driven shifts in theFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Unraveling the spatio-temporal dynamics of soil and root-associated microbiomes in Texas olive orchards.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Pollution pressure drives microbial assemblages that improve the phytoremediation potential of heavy metals by Ricinus communis.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024Article
- The resting cyst of dinoflagellateFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Core Endophytic Bacteria and Their Roles in the Coralloid Roots of CultivatedMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Changes in Bulk and Rhizosphere Soil Microbial Diversity Communities of Native Quinoa Due to the Monocropping in the Peruvian Central Andes.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Culture-Dependent and Metabarcoding Characterization of the Sugar Beet (Microorganisms · 2023Article
- The Application of Sulfur Influences Microbiome of Soybean Rhizosphere and Nutrient-Mobilizing Bacteria in Andosol.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- The Endophytic Root Microbiome Is Different in Healthy and Ralstonia solanacearum-Infected Plants and Is Regulated by a Consortium Containing Beneficial Endophytic Bacteria.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Seasonal Shifts in Bacterial Community Structures in the Lateral Root of Sugar Beet Grown in an Andosol Field in Japan.Microbes and environments · 2023Article
- Understanding the sugar beet holobiont for sustainable agriculture.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Effects of Different Types of Additional Fertilizers on Root-associated Microbes of Napa Cabbage Grown in an Andosol Field in Japan.Microbes and environments · 2022Article
- Diversity Shifts in the Root Microbiome of Cucumber Under Different Plant Cultivation Substrates.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clone libraries of bacterial 16S rRNA genes (a total of 1,980 clones) were constructed from the leaf blades, petioles, taproots, and lateral roots of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) grown under different fertilization conditions. A principal coordinate analysis revealed that the structures of bacterial communities in above- and underground tissues were largely separated by PC1 (44.5%). The bacterial communities of above-ground tissues (leaf blades and petioles) were more tightly clustered regardless of differences in the tissue types and fertilization conditions than those of below-ground tissues (taproots and lateral roots). The bacterial communities of below-ground tissues were largely separated by PC2 (26.0%). To survey plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPBs), isolate collections (a total of 665 isolates) were constructed from the lateral roots. As candidate PGPBs, 44 isolates were selected via clustering analyses with the combined 16S rRNA gene sequence data of clone libraries and isolate collections. The results of inoculation tests using sugar beet seedlings showed that eight isolates exhibited growth-promoting effects on the seedlings. Among them, seven isolates belonging to seven genera (Asticcacaulis, Mesorhizobium, Nocardioides, Sphingobium, Sphingomonas, Sphingopyxis, and Polaromonas) were newly identified as PGPBs for sugar beet at the genus level, and two isolates belonging to two genera (Asticcacaulis and Polaromonas) were revealed to exert growth-promoting effects on the plant at the genus level for the first time. These results suggest that a community analysis-based selection strategy will facilitate the isolation of novel PGPBs and extend the potential for the development of novel biofertilizers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.