ReviewNeural regeneration research2021
A pilot exploration with Posiphen to normalize amyloid precursor protein in Down syndrome.
Review in Neural regeneration research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intestinal Flora Balance Therapy Based on Probiotic Support Improves Cognitive Function and Symptoms in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.BioMed research international · 2022Pooled it
- Amyloid precursor protein dosage normalization rescues neurogenesis and Alzheimer's Disease phenotypes associated with Down Syndrome.Medical research archives · 2026Article
- Exosome-Mediated Delivery of Amyloid Beta Modulators: A Potential Therapeutic Strategy for Alzheimer's Disease.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
- Posiphen Reduces the Levels of Huntingtin Protein through Translation Suppression.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Mechanistic Analysis of Age-Related Clinical Manifestations in Down Syndrome.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.