Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33906964›Full record

ArticleGenome research2021

Reevaluation of the

Luisa Berná, Pablo Marquez, Andrés Cabrera, Gonzalo Greif, María E Francia, Carlos Robello

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular characterization ofRoyal Society open science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Unique Properties of Apicomplexan Mitochondria.Annual review of microbiology · 2023
    Review
  8. New insights into phenotype and genotype relationships inFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Life Cycle and Transmission ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. ExploringGenes · 2020
    Review
  17. Research intoPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luisa BernáLaboratory of Host Pathogen Interactions-Molecular Biology Unit, Institut Pasteur de Montevideo, 11400 Montevideo, Uruguay.
Pablo MarquezLaboratory of Host Pathogen Interactions-Molecular Biology Unit, Institut Pasteur de Montevideo, 11400 Montevideo, Uruguay.
Andrés CabreraLaboratory of Host Pathogen Interactions-Molecular Biology Unit, Institut Pasteur de Montevideo, 11400 Montevideo, Uruguay.
Gonzalo GreifLaboratory of Host Pathogen Interactions-Molecular Biology Unit, Institut Pasteur de Montevideo, 11400 Montevideo, Uruguay.
María E FranciaLaboratory of Apicomplexan Biology, Institut Pasteur de Montevideo, 11400 Montevideo, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0001-9664-9573
Carlos RobelloLaboratory of Host Pathogen Interactions-Molecular Biology Unit, Institut Pasteur de Montevideo, 11400 Montevideo, Uruguay.
Institut Pasteur de Montevideo · UYUniversidad de la República de Uruguay · UY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

CoccidiosisNeosporaToxoplasmaAnimalsCattleFemaleKaryotypePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID33906964
PMCPMC8092007
OpenAlexW3157730500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.