Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33906943›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Communication consumes 35 times more energy than computation in the human cortex, but both costs are needed to predict synapse number.

William B Levy, Victoria G Calvert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Direct energy consumption by inhibitory GABAFrontiers in neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Is stochastic thermodynamics the key to understanding the energy costs of computation?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

William B LevyDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908; wbl@virginia.edu.
Victoria G CalvertCollege of Arts and Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Darwinian evolution tends to produce energy-efficient outcomes. On the other hand, energy limits computation, be it neural and probabilistic or digital and logical. Taking a particular energy-efficient viewpoint, we define neural computation and make use of an energy-constrained computational function. This function can be optimized over a variable that is proportional to the number of synapses per neuron. This function also implies a specific distinction between adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-consuming processes, especially computation per se vs. the communication processes of action potentials and transmitter release. Thus, to apply this mathematical function requires an energy audit with a particular partitioning of energy consumption that differs from earlier work. The audit points out that, rather than the oft-quoted 20 W of glucose available to the human brain, the fraction partitioned to cortical computation is only 0.1 W of ATP [L. Sokoloff,

Indexed as

Action PotentialsBrainCerebellar CortexEnergy MetabolismHumansNerve NetNeuronsPhysical PhenomenaSynapsesbits per joulebrain energy consumptionenergy-efficientneural computationoptimal computation

Identifiers

PMID33906943
PMCPMC8106317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.