Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33906922›Full record

ArticlemBio2021

The Functional Significance of Bacterial Predators.

Bruce A Hungate, Jane C Marks, Mary E Power, Egbert Schwartz, Kees Jan van Groenigen, Steven J Blazewicz, Peter Chuckran, Paul Dijkstra, Brianna K Finley, Mary K Firestone and 16 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. A genomic view of Earth's biomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  8. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Enrichment isolation and metabolic characteristics ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Fatty acid metabolism and the oxidative stress response support bacterial predation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Bruce A HungateCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA Bruce.Hungate@nau.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7337-1887
Jane C MarksCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Mary E PowerDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
Egbert SchwartzCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Kees Jan van GroenigenDepartment of Geography, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Steven J BlazewiczPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7517-1750
Peter ChuckranCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8015-0479
Paul DijkstraCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Brianna K FinleyCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Mary K FirestoneDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4289-3244
Megan FoleyCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Alex GreenlonPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA.
Michaela HayerCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Kirsten S HofmockelPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1586-2167
Benjamin J KochCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Michelle C MackCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Rebecca L MauCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Samantha N MillerCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Ember M MorrisseyDivision of Plant and Soil Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Jeffrey R PropsterCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Alicia M PurcellCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Ella SieradzkiDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7174-3010
Evan P StarrDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Bram W G StoneCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
César TerrerPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5479-3486
Jennifer Pett-RidgePhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4439-2398
Northern Arizona University · USLawrence Livermore National Laboratory · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USPacific Northwest National Laboratory · USUniversity of Exeter · GBWest Virginia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predation structures food webs, influences energy flow, and alters rates and pathways of nutrient cycling through ecosystems, effects that are well documented for macroscopic predators. In the microbial world, predatory bacteria are common, yet little is known about their rates of growth and roles in energy flows through microbial food webs, in part because these are difficult to quantify. Here, we show that growth and carbon uptake were higher in predatory bacteria compared to nonpredatory bacteria, a finding across 15 sites, synthesizing 82 experiments and over 100,000 taxon-specific measurements of element flow into newly synthesized bacterial DNA. Obligate predatory bacteria grew 36% faster and assimilated carbon at rates 211% higher than nonpredatory bacteria. These differences were less pronounced for facultative predators (6% higher growth rates, 17% higher carbon assimilation rates), though high growth and carbon assimilation rates were observed for some facultative predators, such as members of the genera

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsBacteriaBacteriophagesCarbonDeltaproteobacteriaDNA, BacterialCarbonDNA, Bacterial18O-H2OBdellovibriofood webspredatorqSIPstable isotope probingtop-down controltrophic interactions

Identifiers

PMID33906922
PMCPMC8092244
OpenAlexW3132521216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.