SynthesisBMJ open2021
Experiences and views of receiving and delivering information about recovery in acquired neurological conditions: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- MEET & MAKE CleaR PROCESS: a new framework for sharing serious information.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Research progress of quantitative electroencephalography in post-ischemic stroke mental disorders.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Coproducing an intervention to support stroke unit staff to provide information about recovery to patients and carers.PEC innovation · 2026Article
- Perspectives and Requirements of Patients with Prostate Cancer on Mobile Health Interventions During Androgen Deprivation Therapy: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
- Received Knowledge of Care as Evaluated by Patients and Their Significant Others: A Feedback-Register Study.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2025Observational
- Article
- Research investigating patient and carer psychoeducation needs regarding post-stroke cognition: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Using the Behaviour Change Wheel to develop an intervention to improve conversations about recovery on the stroke unit.PloS one · 2025Article
- Palliative care needs of Jordanian women's experience of living with stroke: a descriptive phenomenological study.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- Understanding the Professional Care Experience of Patients with Stroke: A Qualitative Study Using In-Depth Interviews.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo review and synthesise qualitative literature relating to the views, perceptions and experiences of patients with acquired neurological conditions and their caregivers about the process of receiving information about recovery; as well as the views and experiences of healthcare professionals involved in delivering this information.
designSystematic review of qualitative studies. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science and the Cochrane library were searched from their inception to July 2019. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers extracted data from the included studies and assessed quality using an established tool. Thematic synthesis was used to synthesise the findings of included studies.
resultsSearches yielded 9105 titles, with 145 retained for full-text screening. Twenty-eight studies (30 papers) from eight countries were included. Inductive analysis resulted in 11 descriptive themes, from which 5 analytical themes were generated: the right information at the right time; managing expectations; it's not what you say, it's how you say it; learning how to talk about recovery and manage emotions; the context of uncertainty.
conclusionsOur findings highlight the inherent challenges in talking about recovery in an emotional context, where breaking bad news is a key feature. Future interventions should focus on preparing staff to meet patients' and families' information needs, as well as ensuring they have the skills to discuss potential recovery and break bad news compassionately and share the uncertain trajectory characteristic of acquired neurological conditions. An agreed team-based approach to talking about recovery is recommended to ensure consistency and improve the experiences of patients and their families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.