Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33906619›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Occupational burnout and job satisfaction among physicians in times of COVID-19 crisis: a convergent parallel mixed-method study.

Hamzeh Mohammad Alrawashdeh, Ala'a B Al-Tammemi, Mohammad Kh Alzawahreh, Ashraf Al-Tamimi, Mohamed Elkholy, Fawaz Al Sarireh, Mohammad Abusamak, Nafisa M K Elehamer, Ahmad Malkawi, Wedad Al-Dolat and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. GP wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hamzeh Mohammad AlrawashdehSharif Eye Centers, Irbid, Jordan.
Ala'a B Al-TammemiDepartment of Family and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. alaa.tammemi@med.unideb.hu.ORCID 0000-0003-0862-0186
Mohammad Kh AlzawahrehDepartment of Special Surgery, Division of Urology, Al Bashir Hospital, Ministry of Health, Amman, Jordan.
Ashraf Al-TamimiDepartment of Radiology, King Hussein Hospital, Jordanian Royal Medical Services, Amman, Jordan.
Mohamed ElkholyDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Fawaz Al SarirehDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Mutah University, Karak, Jordan.
Mohammad AbusamakDepartment of General and Special Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Al Balqa Applied University, Salt, Jordan.
Nafisa M K ElehamerDoctoral School of Health Sciences, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Ahmad MalkawiSchool of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Wedad Al-DolatDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.
Luai Abu-IsmailDepartment of Clinical Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.
Ali Al-FarDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Jordan Hospital, Amman, Jordan.
Imene GhoulDepartment of Pediatrics, Ibn Al Haytham Hospital, Amman, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare professionals including physicians were subjected to an increased workload during the COVID-19 crisis, leaving them exposed to significant physical and psychological distress. Therefore, our present study aimed to (i) assess the prevalence of burnout and levels of job satisfaction among physicians in Jordan, and (ii) explore physicians' opinions, experiences, and perceptions during the pandemic crisis.

methodsThis was a mixed-method study that utilized a structured web-based questionnaire and semi-structured individual interviews. The 10-Item Burnout Measure-Short version (BMS), and the 5-Item Short Index of Job Satisfaction (SIJS) were adopted to assess occupational burnout and job satisfaction, respectively. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, based on a conceptual framework that was developed from Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory of Motivation and Job Demands-Resources Model. Descriptive statistics and regression models, as well as inductive thematic analysis, were used to analyze quantitative and qualitative data, respectively.

resultsA total of 973 survey responses and 11 interviews were included in our analysis. The prevalence of burnout among physicians was (57.7%). Several significant factors were positively associated with burnout, including female gender, working at highly loaded hospitals, working for long hours, doing night shifts, lack of sufficient access to personal protective equipment, and being positively tested for SARS-CoV-2. Regarding job satisfaction, regression analysis revealed that age was positively associated with higher levels of job satisfaction. On contrary, being a general practitioner or specialist, working at highly loaded hospitals, low salaries, and suffering from burnout have predicted lower levels of job satisfaction. Besides, four themes have emerged from the thematic analysis: (i) Work-induced psychological distress during the pandemic, (ii) Decision-driven satisfactory and dissatisfactory experiences, (iii) Impact of the pandemic on doctor-patient communication and professional skills, and (iv) Economic impacts of the pandemic crisis and lockdown.

conclusionA significant physical and psychological burden was associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Reliable efforts should be implemented aiming at protecting physicians' physical and mental wellbeing, enhancing their working conditions, and raising awareness about burnout. Evidence-based decisions and proper utilization of financial and human resources at institutional and national levels are believed to be crucial for the sustainability of the health workforce, especially in crises.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalCOVID-19PhysiciansCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionJordanPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesConvergent parallelCOVID-19 pandemicJob satisfactionJordanMixed-methodOccupational burnoutPhysical burdenPhysiciansPsychological distress

Identifiers

PMID33906619
PMCPMC8079229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.