ReviewJournal of dental research2021
Inductive Materials for Regenerative Engineering.
Review in Journal of dental research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Osteoinductive low-dose 3D porous calcium phosphate graphene oxide-integrated matrices enhance osteogenesis and mechanical properties.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Early new bone formation in ovine intramuscular defects: comparison between different silicate-containing calcium phosphate synthetic bone grafts.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Graphene-Based Materials for Bone Regeneration in Dentistry: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Applications and Material Comparisons.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Magnesium phosphate functionalized graphene oxide and PLGA composite matrices with enhanced mechanical and osteogenic properties for bone regeneration.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Article
- Article
- Graphene: A Multifaceted Carbon-Based Material for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications.ACS omega · 2024Review
- Review
- Biomimetic Remineralized Three-Dimensional Collagen Bone Matrices with an Enhanced Osteostimulating Effect.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Biological Activities of Glass Ionomer Cement Supplemented with Fortilin on Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Article
- Interface between Materials and Oral Biology.Journal of dental research · 2021Article
- Enhanced glass ionomer cement with bioactive additives for collagen synthesis and inflammation in pulp-rabbit teeth.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Regenerative engineering has pioneered several novel biomaterials to treat critical-sized bone injuries. However, despite significant improvement in synthetic materials research, some limitations still exist. The constraints correlated with the current grafting methods signify a treatment paradigm shift to osteoinductive regenerative engineering approaches. Because of their intrinsic potential, inductive biomaterials may represent alternative approaches to treating critical bone injuries. Osteoinductive scaffolds stimulate stem cell differentiation into the osteoblastic lineage, enhancing bone regeneration. Inductive biomaterials comprise polymers, calcium phosphate ceramics, metals, and graphene family materials. This review will assess the cellular behavior toward properties of inductive materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.