Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33906384›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2021

Metabolic buffer analysis reveals the simultaneous, independent control of ATP and adenylate energy ratios.

Edward J Hancock, James R Krycer, Jordan Ang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. What can ATP content tell us about Barth syndrome muscle phenotypes?Journal of translational genetics and genomics · 2025
    Article
  4. Stabilization of antithetic control via molecular buffering.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Edward J HancockSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Sydney, 2006, Australia.
James R KrycerSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Sydney, 2006, Australia.
Jordan AngSynthace Ltd, London, W12 7FQ, UK.
The University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining the underlying principles behind biological regulation is important for understanding the principles of life, treating complex diseases and creating de novo synthetic biology. Buffering-the use of reservoirs of molecules to maintain molecular concentrations-is a widespread and important mechanism for biological regulation. However, a lack of theory has limited our understanding of its roles and quantified effects. Here, we study buffering in energy metabolism using control theory and novel buffer analysis. We find that buffering can enable the simultaneous, independent control of multiple coupled outputs. In metabolism, adenylate kinase and AMP deaminase enable simultaneous control of ATP and adenylate energy ratios, while feedback on metabolic pathways is fundamentally limited to controlling one of these outputs. We also quantify the regulatory effects of the phosphagen system-the above buffers and creatine kinase-revealing which mechanisms regulate which outputs. The results are supported by human muscle and mouse adipocyte data. Together, these results illustrate the synergy of feedback and buffering in molecular biology to simultaneously control multiple outputs.

Indexed as

Creatine KinaseEnergy MetabolismAdenosine TriphosphateAnimalsMiceMusclesAdenosine TriphosphateCreatine Kinasebimolecular regulation and controlbioenergeticscontrol theory

Identifiers

PMID33906384
PMCPMC8086841
OpenAlexW3158682300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.