ArticleMedical physics2021
Automated delineation of orbital abscess depicted on CT scan using deep learning.
Article in Medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: Glaucoma, Cornea, and Oculoplastics.Cureus · 2024Review
- Treatment planning for photodynamic therapy of abscess cavities using patient-specific optical properties measured prior to illumination.Physics in medicine and biology · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence Automation of Proptosis Measurement: An Indicator for Pediatric Orbital Abscess Surgery.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
- Automated detection and segmentation of pulmonary embolisms on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) using deep learning but without manual outlining.Medical image analysis · 2023Article
- Automated segmentation of five different body tissues on computed tomography using deep learning.Medical physics · 2023Article
- Article
- Super U-Net: a modularized generalizable architecture.Pattern recognition · 2022Article
- Orbital and eyelid diseases: The next breakthrough in artificial intelligence?Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo develop and validate a deep learning algorithm to automatically detect and segment an orbital abscess depicted on computed tomography (CT).
methodsWe retrospectively collected orbital CT scans acquired on 67 pediatric subjects with a confirmed orbital abscess in the setting of infectious orbital cellulitis. A context-aware convolutional neural network (CA-CNN) was developed and trained to automatically segment orbital abscess. To reduce the requirement for a large dataset, transfer learning was used by leveraging a pre-trained model for CT-based lung segmentation. An ophthalmologist manually delineated orbital abscesses depicted on the CT images. The classical U-Net and the CA-CNN models with and without transfer learning were trained and tested on the collected dataset using the 10-fold cross-validation method. Dice coefficient, Jaccard index, and Hausdorff distance were used as performance metrics to assess the agreement between the computerized and manual segmentations.
resultsThe context-aware U-Net with transfer learning achieved an average Dice coefficient and Jaccard index of 0.78 ± 0.12 and 0.65 ± 0.13, which were consistently higher than the classical U-Net or the context-aware U-Net without transfer learning (P < 0.01). The average differences of the abscess between the computerized results and the experts in terms of volume and Hausdorff distance were 0.10 ± 0.11 mL and 1.94 ± 1.21 mm, respectively. The context-aware U-Net detected all orbital abscess without false positives.
conclusionsThe deep learning solution demonstrated promising performance in detecting and segmenting orbital abscesses on CT images in strong agreement with a human observer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.