Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33906127›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of emergency medicine2021

Modified PRIEST score for identification of very low-risk COVID patients.

Edward H Suh, Kendrick J Lang, Lillian M Zerihun

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. The Internet, Apps, and the Anesthesiologist.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edward H SuhDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University, 622 W. 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, United States. Electronic address: ehs2109@columbia.edu.
Kendrick J LangColumbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, 630 W. 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, United States. Electronic address: kjl2174@columbia.edu.
Lillian M ZerihunColumbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, 622 W. 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, United States. Electronic address: lmz2115@columbia.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 transmission remains high around the world, and severe local outbreaks continue to occur. Prognostic tools may be useful in crisis conditions as risk stratification can help determine resource allocation. One published tool, the Pandemic Respiratory Infection Emergency System Triage Severity Score, seems particularly promising because of its predictive ability and ease of application at the bedside. We sought to understand the performance of a modified version of this score (mPRIEST) in our institution for identifying patients with a greater than minimal risk for adverse outcome (death or organ support) at 30 days after index visit.

methodsConsecutive visits at two northern Manhattan EDs with a new diagnosis of symptomatic COVID-19 were identified between November and December of 2020. Demographic variables and clinical characteristics were obtained from chart review. Outcomes were obtained from chart review and follow-up phone call.

resultsOutcomes were available on 306 patients. The incidence of death or mechanical ventilation at 30 days for patients in patients with mPRIEST above the threshold value was 43/181 (23.8%), and for patients below 1/125 (0.8%). The sensitivity of the score for adverse outcome was 97.7% (95% CI: 93.3% to 100%).

conclusionsThis data suggests the mPRIEST score, which can be calculated from clinical variables alone, has potential for use in EDs to identify patients at very low risk for adverse outcomes within 30 days of COVID diagnosis. This should be confirmed in larger formal validation studies in diverse settings.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesAdultAgedCOVID-19Emergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew YorkPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRespiration, ArtificialRisk AssessmentTime FactorsTriageCOVID-19Crisis carePrognostic tools

Identifiers

PMID33906127
PMCPMC8062911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.