ArticleJournal of biomechanics2021
The effects of a simple optical clearing protocol on the mechanics of collagenous soft tissue.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experimental characterization of high-strain-rate viscoelastic and damage behavior in anisotropic soft materials using laser-induced inertial cavitation.Research square · 2026Article
- Optomechanical Properties of Swine Skin Tissue Treated With a Nontoxic Optical Clearing Agent.Journal of biophotonics · 2025Article
- Tricuspid valve leaflet remodeling in sheep with biventricular heart failure: A comparison between leaflets.Acta biomaterialia · 2025Article
- Texas TriValve 1.0 : a reverse‑engineered, open model of the human tricuspid valve.Engineering with computers · 2022Article
- Optical Coherence Elastography as a Tool for Studying Deformations in Biomaterials: Spatially-Resolved Osmotic Strain Dynamics in Cartilaginous Samples.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Optical clearing of biological tissues improves imaging depth for light transmission imaging modalities such as two-photon microscopy. In studies that investigate the interplay between microstructure and tissue-level mechanics, mechanical testing of cleared tissue may be useful. However, the effects of optical clearing on soft tissue mechanics have not been investigated. Thus, we set out to quantify the effects of a simple and effective optical clearing protocol on the mechanics of soft collagenous tissues using ovine mitral valve anterior leaflets as a model system. First, we demonstrate the effectiveness of an isotonic glycerol-DMSO optical clearing protocol in two-photon microscopy. Second, we evaluate the mechanical effects of optical clearing on leaflets under equibiaxial tension in a dependent study design. Lastly, we quantify the shrinkage strain while traction-free and the contractile forces while constrained during clearing. We found the optical clearing protocol to improve two-photon imaging depth from ~100 μm to ~500-800 μm, enabling full-thickness visualization of second-harmonic generation, autofluorescent, and fluorophore-tagged structures. Under equibiaxial tension, cleared tissues exhibited reduced circumferential (p < 0.001) and radial (p = 0.009) transition stretches (i.e. stretch where collagen is recruited), and reduced radial stiffness (p = 0.031). Finally, during clearing we observed ~10-15% circumferential and radial compressive strains, and when constrained, ~2mN of circumferential and radial traction forces. In summary, we suggest the use of this optical clearing agent with mechanical testing be done with care, as it appears to alter the tissue's stress-free configuration and stiffness, likely due to tissue dehydration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.