Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33905560›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2021

Learning fuzzy clustering for SPECT/CT segmentation via convolutional neural networks.

Junyu Chen, Ye Li, Licia P Luna, Hyun W Chung, Steven P Rowe, Yong Du, Lilja B Solnes, Eric C Frey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Junyu ChenDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ye LiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Licia P LunaRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutes, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Hyun W ChungDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Steven P RoweRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutes, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Yong DuRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutes, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Lilja B SolnesRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutes, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Eric C FreyDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Multi-Modality Quantitiative Imaging for Evaluation of Response to Cancer TherapyU01CA140204 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DU, YONG, SOLNES, LILJA · 2011 to 2022
$6.1M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA140204NCI NIH HHS U01-CA140204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeQuantitative bone single-photon emission computed tomography (QBSPECT) has the potential to provide a better quantitative assessment of bone metastasis than planar bone scintigraphy due to its ability to better quantify activity in overlapping structures. An important element of assessing the response of bone metastasis is accurate image segmentation. However, limited by the properties of QBSPECT images, the segmentation of anatomical regions-of-interests (ROIs) still relies heavily on the manual delineation by experts. This work proposes a fast and robust automated segmentation method for partitioning a QBSPECT image into lesion, bone, and background.

methodsWe present a new unsupervised segmentation loss function and its semi- and supervised variants for training a convolutional neural network (ConvNet). The loss functions were developed based on the objective function of the classical Fuzzy C-means (FCM) algorithm. The first proposed loss function can be computed within the input image itself without any ground truth labels, and is thus unsupervised; the proposed supervised loss function follows the traditional paradigm of the deep learning-based segmentation methods and leverages ground truth labels during training. The last loss function is a combination of the first and the second and includes a weighting parameter, which enables semi-supervised segmentation using deep learning neural network. EXPERIMENTS AND

resultsWe conducted a comprehensive study to compare our proposed methods with ConvNets trained using supervised, cross-entropy and Dice loss functions, and conventional clustering methods. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and several other metrics were used as figures of merit as applied to the task of delineating lesion and bone in both simulated and clinical SPECT/CT images. We experimentally demonstrated that the proposed methods yielded good segmentation results on a clinical dataset even though the training was done using realistic simulated images. On simulated SPECT/CT, the proposed unsupervised model's accuracy was greater than the conventional clustering methods while reducing computation time by 200-fold. For the clinical QBSPECT/CT, the proposed semi-supervised ConvNet model, trained using simulated images, produced DSCs of

conclusionsA ConvNet-based image segmentation method that uses novel loss functions was developed and evaluated. The method can operate in unsupervised, semi-supervised, or fully-supervised modes depending on the availability of annotated training data. The results demonstrated that the proposed method provides fast and robust lesion and bone segmentation for QBSPECT/CT. The method can potentially be applied to other medical image segmentation applications.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedCluster AnalysisNeural Networks, ComputerSingle Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomographyconvolutional neural networksfuzzy C-meansimage segmentationnuclear medicine

Identifiers

PMID33905560
PMCPMC9973404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.