Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33905501›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2021

Recognizing and validating ligands with CheckMyBlob.

Dariusz Brzezinski, Przemyslaw J Porebski, Marcin Kowiel, Joanna M Macnar, Wladek Minor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Finding antibodies in cryo-EM maps with CrAI.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Ligand Identification in CryoEM and X-ray Maps Using Deep Learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. ADP enhances the allosteric activation of eukaryotic elongation factor 2 kinase by calmodulin.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Docking-Based Prediction of Peptide Binding to MHC Proteins.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dariusz BrzezinskiDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9723-525X
Przemyslaw J PorebskiDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8012-5791
Marcin KowielCenter for Biocrystallographic Research, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan, 61-704, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6269-3151
Joanna M MacnarDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1760-2668
Wladek MinorDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7075-7090

Funding

Reproducible, Unbiased Ligand Identification Assisted by Artificial Intelligence and Development of Ligand Reference LibrariesR01GM132595 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI MINOR, WLADEK · 2019 to 2022
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM132595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structure-guided drug design depends on the correct identification of ligands in crystal structures of protein complexes. However, the interpretation of the electron density maps is challenging and often burdened with confirmation bias. Ligand identification can be aided by automatic methods such as CheckMyBlob, a machine learning algorithm that learns to generalize ligand descriptions from sets of moieties deposited in the Protein Data Bank. Here, we present the CheckMyBlob web server, a platform that can identify ligands in unmodeled fragments of electron density maps or validate ligands in existing models. The server processes PDB/mmCIF and MTZ files and returns a ranking of 10 most likely ligands for each detected electron density blob along with interactive 3D visualizations. Additionally, for each prediction/validation, a plugin script is generated that enables users to conduct a detailed analysis of the server results in Coot. The CheckMyBlob web server is available at https://checkmyblob.bioreproducibility.org.

Indexed as

LigandsSoftwareCluster AnalysisCrystallographyDatabases, ProteinMachine LearningMetalsPeptidesWaterLigandsMetalsPeptidesWater

Identifiers

PMID33905501
PMCPMC8262754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.