Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33905485›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2021

Tolerability of Cefazolin in Nafcillin-Intolerant Patients for the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Infections.

Ankit M Gandhi, Megan D Shah, Lindsay E Donohue, Heather L Cox, Joshua C Eby

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Evolution under vancomycin selection drives divergent collateral sensitivity patterns inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ankit M GandhiDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Megan D ShahDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Lindsay E DonohueDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Heather L CoxDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Joshua C EbyDivision of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
University of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to nafcillin are commonly reported, but scarce data are available to guide appropriate antibiotic change following these reactions. Although cefazolin is an attractive therapeutic alternative in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections when patients experience an HSR to nafcillin, more data are needed to evaluate the tolerability of cefazolin after switching from nafcillin. The purpose of this study was to describe the tolerability of cefazolin in patients who develop a suspected non-IgE-mediated HSR to nafcillin.

methodsThis was a retrospective, descriptive case series of patients who received nafcillin for an MSSA infection, experienced a suspected non-IgE-mediated HSR, and were switched to cefazolin between October 2015 and November 2019 at a single academic medical center. The primary objective was to identify the percentage of patients who completed cefazolin after experiencing a suspected non-IgE-mediated HSR to nafcillin.

resultsThere were 80 patients with 87 prespecified non-IgE-mediated HSRs during the study period. Seventy-one (89%) patients completed cefazolin, with 53 (75%) of these patients completing at least 2 weeks of therapy. One patient was ultimately switched from cefazolin to daptomycin due to concern for treatment failure. Eight patients (10%) did not tolerate cefazolin after switching from nafcillin. Of these, 3 patients experienced an unrelated HSR, whereas 5 patients experienced the same non-IgE-mediated HSR that was attributed to nafcillin and discontinued cefazolin within 7 days. The most common HSR cited was immune-mediated nephritis; however, the majority were clinically presumed but did not meet objective diagnostic criteria.

conclusionsTreatment with cefazolin after experiencing a suspected non-IgE-mediated HSR to nafcillin appears to be safe, even for patients requiring a prolonged duration of cefazolin.

Indexed as

BacteremiaStaphylococcal InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefazolinHumansMethicillinNafcillinRetrospective StudiesStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefazolinMethicillinNafcillincefazolinhypersensitivity reactionMSSAnafcillin

Identifiers

PMID33905485
PMCPMC8825210
OpenAlexW3157779152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.