ArticlePloS one2021
Developing and validating a questionnaire to assess an individual's perceived risk of four major non-communicable diseases in Myanmar.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk perception of non-communicable diseases: A systematic review on its assessment and associated factors.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Sarcopenia Disease Risk Perception Scale among Turkish older adults.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Assessment tools for disease risk perception in chronic patients: theoretical frameworks, psychometric properties, and clinical applications.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Development, validation, and reliability of a questionnaire to assess risk-factors of chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology.Journal of nephrology · 2025Article
- Factor analysis validation of the student feedback questionnaire for the subcutaneous swelling simulation model.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a Malay version questionnaire for assessing risk perception of type 2 diabetes (RPDM).PloS one · 2025Article
- Development and validation of the sarcopenia disease risk perception scale for older adults.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- The development and validation of theHeliyon · 2024Article
- Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Patient Satisfaction with an Automated Drug Dispensing System.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Development of a Study Tool to Measure Awareness of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Among Cancer Patients and Their Intention to Recommend the Vaccine.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2024Article
- Article
- Development and validation of a questionnaire about hidden curriculum in medical institutes: A pilot study.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Impact of Job Demands on Employee Learning: The Moderating Role of Human-Machine Cooperation Relationship.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adopting healthy lifestyles is greatly influenced by an individual's perceived risk of developing non-communicable diseases (NCDs). This study aimed to develop and validate a questionnaire that can assess an individual's perceived risk of developing four major NCDs. We used the exploratory sequential mixed methods design. The qualitative part developed a questionnaire by two rounds of Delphi expert panels. The quantitative part validated the questionnaire using both exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We used separate samples for EFA (n = 150) and CFA (n = 210). The participants were aged between 25-60 years of both sexes with no known history of NCDs, and face-to-face interviews were conducted. First, we generated an 86-item questionnaire based on the health belief model. Two expert panels ensured the questionnaire's content validity. The experts removed the overlapped items and items that did not represent the specific construct and developed a 51-item questionnaire. Next, we validated the questionnaire. We conducted a parallel analysis to determine the number of factors to be extracted. EFA constituted a five-factor model with 22 high loading items, which extracted 54% of the variance. We run four CFA models (single factor, five-factor, bifactor, and hierarchical) and tested the hypothesized five-factor model. It was found that the 21-item questionnaire (removed one efficacy item due to low loading) was satisfied with good psychometric properties and fitted with observed data in the bifactor model (RMSEA = 0.051, CFI = 0.954, TLI = 0.938, SRMR = 0.054). Hence, an individual's perceived risk of getting NCDs was constituted with a general perceived risk construct and five specific constructs (perceived susceptibility, perceived barrier, perceived benefit, perceived self-efficacy, and perceived behavioral change intention). It can be measured using the developed questionnaire (NCD-PR5-21). Further research is warranted to assess the questionnaire's utility in a mismatch between risk perception and current risk; and individualized counseling for behavioral change communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.