ArticleCurrent microbiology2021
Seasonal Distribution of Cyanobacteria in Three Urban Eutrophic Lakes Results from an Epidemic-like Response to Environmental Conditions.
Article in Current microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phytoplankton community dynamics and their role in naphthenic acid transformation within a constructed wetland system treating oil sands process-affected water.Environmental microbiome · 2026Article
- Spatial Heterogeneity in Methane Biogeochemistry and Prokaryotic Community Structure in Sub-Arctic Waterbodies in Northern Canada.Environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- HABS-BLOCKS©, a Floating, Slow-Release Glucose Source, Promoted the Growth of Heterotrophic Bacteria Relative to Toxic Cyanobacteria in Lake Water Mesocosms.Journal of water resource and protection · 2024Article
- Analysis of the core bacterial community associated with consumer-ready Eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica).PloS one · 2023Article
- Comparison of Growth Performance, Pigment Synthesis, and Esterase Activity of Synechococcus sp. HS01 and Limnothrix sp. KO01 in Response to Cadmium Toxicity.Current microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cyanobacterial communities of three co-located eutrophic sandpit lakes were surveyed during 2016 and 2017 over season and depth using high-throughput DNA sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. All three lakes were stratified except during April 2017 when the lakes were recovering from a strong mixing event. 16S rRNA gene V4 sequences were parsed into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 99% sequence identity. After rarefaction of 139 samples to 25,000 sequences per sample, a combined total of 921,529 partial 16S rRNA gene sequences were identified as cyanobacteria. They were binned into 19,588 unique cyanobacterial OTUs. Of these OTUs, 11,303 were Cyanobium. Filamentous Planktothrix contributed 1537 and colonial Microcystis contributed 265. The remaining 6482 OTUs were considered unclassified. For Planktothrix and Microcystis one OTU accounted for greater than 95% of the total sequences for each genus. However, in both cases the non-dominant OTUs clustered with the dominant OTUs by date, lake, and depth. All Planktothrix OTUs and a single Cyanobium OTU were detected below the oxycline. All other Cyanobium and Microcystis OTUs were detected above the oxycline. The distribution of Cyanobium OTUs between lakes and seasons can be explained by an epidemic-like response where individual OTUs clonally rise from a diverse hypolimnion population when conditions are appropriate. The importance of using 99% identity over the more commonly used 97% is discussed with respect to cyanobacterial community structure. The approach described here can provide another valuable tool for assessing cyanobacterial populations and provide greater insight into the controls of cyanobacterial blooms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.